[Wed May  1 08:23:53 2013] Detection parameters:
  Position = (435.5, 954.2) = 13 37 9.84 -29 50 27.1
  Extent = 0.8" x 0.5", rotation angle = 141 degrees
  Source counts = 12.0 +/- 4.0
  Background counts = 4.0
  Rate = 0.0002 +/- 8e-05

[Wed May  1 08:23:54 2013] Off-axis axis estimate = 0.41'
[Wed May  1 09:19:27 2013] Using EEF radius (= 0.40 ")to estimate initial spatial extent for simple fitting
[Wed May  1 09:19:27 2013] Initial guess for spatial extent in simple fitting = 0.40"
[Wed May  1 09:19:27 2013] source mask rpix=0.8, npix_max = 6, mask sum = 9, frac = 1.315
[Wed May  1 09:19:27 2013] Giving source the simple spatial ID 98 for pass 0, mean size = 0.40"
[Wed May  1 11:25:21 2013] fullrun_ccd7_acisf12993_pi14-548_cl_pass0_src98.ximg exists
[Wed May  1 11:25:21 2013] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_ccd7_acisf12993_pi14-548_cl_pass0_src98.csv
[Wed May  1 11:25:21 2013] fullrun_ccd7_acisf12993_pi14-548_cl_pass0_src98_1.ximg exists
[Wed May  1 11:25:21 2013] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_ccd7_acisf12993_pi14-548_cl_pass0_src98.csv
[Wed May  1 11:25:21 2013] It looks like the fit did not converge
You should probably delete fullrun_ccd7_acisf12993_pi14-548_cl_pass0_src98_1.ximg
Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_ccd7_acisf12993_pi14-548_cl_pass0_src98.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes
[Wed May  1 11:25:22 2013] fullrun_ccd7_acisf12993_pi14-548_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src98.ximg exists
[Wed May  1 11:25:22 2013] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_ccd7_acisf12993_pi14-548_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src98.csv
[Wed May  1 11:25:22 2013] fullrun_ccd7_acisf12993_pi14-548_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src98_1.ximg exists
[Wed May  1 11:25:22 2013] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_ccd7_acisf12993_pi14-548_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src98.csv
[Wed May  1 11:25:22 2013] It looks like the fit did not converge
You should probably delete fullrun_ccd7_acisf12993_pi14-548_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src98_1.ximg
Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_ccd7_acisf12993_pi14-548_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src98.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes
[Wed May  1 11:25:41 2013] Spatial fit model total counts = 15.853700, observed total counts = 27.000000
[Wed May  1 11:25:41 2013] Poor agreement between spatial fit and data for source 81
It may help to tweak spatial fit manually
Not incorporating fit results
[Wed May  1 11:25:41 2013] Vigneting correction estimate = 1.000000
[Wed May  1 11:25:41 2013] Source flux estimate in the 0.3-8.0 bandpass, Gamma=1.800000 = 0 
[Wed May  1 11:25:41 2013] Assessing source extent using major
[Wed May  1 11:25:41 2013] Source does appear to be extended
[Wed May  1 11:25:41 2013] Computing asymmetry using major and minor axis, asym = 1.54
[Wed May  1 11:25:41 2013] Source is asymmetric
[Wed May  1 11:25:41 2013] Deleting source due to low Poisson probability 0.8