[Thu May 16 22:29:29 2013] Detection parameters:
  Position = (928.5, 515.3) = 10 58 37.11 -23 27 16.9
  Extent = 0.5" x 0.5", rotation angle = 121 degrees
  Source counts = 64.1 +/- 8.1
  Background counts = 0.9
  Rate = 0.004 +/- 0.0005

[Thu May 16 22:29:30 2013] Off-axis axis estimate = 0.31'
[Thu May 16 23:49:17 2013] Using EEF radius (= 0.40 ")to estimate initial spatial extent for simple fitting
[Thu May 16 23:49:17 2013] Initial guess for spatial extent in simple fitting = 0.40"
[Thu May 16 23:49:17 2013] source mask rpix=0.8, npix_max = 6, mask sum = 9, frac = 1.289
[Thu May 16 23:49:17 2013] Giving source the simple spatial ID 4 for pass 0, mean size = 0.40"
[Fri May 17 00:03:42 2013] fullrun_ccd7_acisf12921_pi14-548_cl_pass0_src4.ximg exists
[Fri May 17 00:03:42 2013] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_ccd7_acisf12921_pi14-548_cl_pass0_src4.csv
[Fri May 17 00:03:42 2013] fullrun_ccd7_acisf12921_pi14-548_cl_pass0_src4_1.ximg exists
[Fri May 17 00:03:42 2013] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_ccd7_acisf12921_pi14-548_cl_pass0_src4.csv
[Fri May 17 00:03:42 2013] It looks like the fit did not converge
You should probably delete fullrun_ccd7_acisf12921_pi14-548_cl_pass0_src4_1.ximg
Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_ccd7_acisf12921_pi14-548_cl_pass0_src4.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes
[Fri May 17 00:03:42 2013] fullrun_ccd7_acisf12921_pi14-548_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src4.ximg exists
[Fri May 17 00:03:42 2013] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_ccd7_acisf12921_pi14-548_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src4.csv
[Fri May 17 00:03:42 2013] fullrun_ccd7_acisf12921_pi14-548_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src4_1.ximg exists
[Fri May 17 00:03:42 2013] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_ccd7_acisf12921_pi14-548_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src4.csv
[Fri May 17 00:03:42 2013] It looks like the fit did not converge
You should probably delete fullrun_ccd7_acisf12921_pi14-548_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src4_1.ximg
Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_ccd7_acisf12921_pi14-548_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src4.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes
[Fri May 17 00:03:48 2013] Spatial fit model total counts = 62.150600, observed total counts = 124.000000
[Fri May 17 00:03:48 2013] Poor agreement between spatial fit and data for source 3
It may help to tweak spatial fit manually
Not incorporating fit results
[Fri May 17 00:03:48 2013] Vigneting correction estimate = 1.000000
[Fri May 17 00:03:48 2013] Source flux estimate in the 0.3-8.0 bandpass, Gamma=1.800000 = 0 
[Fri May 17 00:03:48 2013] Assessing source extent using major
[Fri May 17 00:03:48 2013] Source does appear to be extended
[Fri May 17 00:03:48 2013] Computing asymmetry using major and minor axis, asym = 1.00
[Fri May 17 01:20:00 2013] Using EEF radius (= 0.40 ")to estimate initial spatial extent for simple fitting
[Fri May 17 01:20:00 2013] Initial guess for spatial extent in simple fitting = 0.40"
[Fri May 17 01:20:00 2013] source mask rpix=0.8, npix_max = 6, mask sum = 9, frac = 1.289
[Fri May 17 01:20:00 2013] Giving source the simple spatial ID 4 for pass 1, mean size = 0.40"
[Fri May 17 01:33:56 2013] fullrun_ccd7_acisf12921_pi14-548_cl_pass1_src4.ximg exists
[Fri May 17 01:33:56 2013] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_ccd7_acisf12921_pi14-548_cl_pass1_src4.csv
[Fri May 17 01:33:56 2013] fullrun_ccd7_acisf12921_pi14-548_cl_pass1_src4_1.ximg exists
[Fri May 17 01:33:56 2013] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_ccd7_acisf12921_pi14-548_cl_pass1_src4.csv
[Fri May 17 01:33:56 2013] It looks like the fit did not converge
You should probably delete fullrun_ccd7_acisf12921_pi14-548_cl_pass1_src4_1.ximg
Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_ccd7_acisf12921_pi14-548_cl_pass1_src4.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes
[Fri May 17 01:33:56 2013] fullrun_ccd7_acisf12921_pi14-548_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src4.ximg exists
[Fri May 17 01:33:56 2013] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_ccd7_acisf12921_pi14-548_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src4.csv
[Fri May 17 01:33:56 2013] fullrun_ccd7_acisf12921_pi14-548_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src4_1.ximg exists
[Fri May 17 01:33:56 2013] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_ccd7_acisf12921_pi14-548_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src4.csv
[Fri May 17 01:33:56 2013] It looks like the fit did not converge
You should probably delete fullrun_ccd7_acisf12921_pi14-548_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src4_1.ximg
Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_ccd7_acisf12921_pi14-548_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src4.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes
[Fri May 17 01:34:02 2013] Spatial fit model total counts = 124.468000, observed total counts = 126.000000
[Fri May 17 01:34:02 2013] Offset between fit and detection position for source 3 = 4.630041 pixels
[Fri May 17 01:34:02 2013] Warning, changing simple spatial fit ID from 4 to 3
[Fri May 17 01:34:02 2013] 135.826053 total counts/ 135.826000 bgd. counts: snr = 0.000005
Spatial fit parameters:
  Offset between fit and detection position for source 3 = 4.630041 pixels
  Position = (932.0, 512.3) = 10 58 37.01 -23 27 18.6
  Extent = 1.5 (0.1-3.0)", rotation angle = 0
  Source counts = 0.0 +/- 11.7
  Background counts = 135.8
  Rate = 4e-09 +/- 0.0008
  Deleting source due to low Poisson probability