[Mon May 13 23:21:29 2013] Detection parameters:
  Position = (553.4, 569.4) = 22 40 22.38 3 23 46.0
  Extent = 0.6" x 0.5", rotation angle = 66 degrees
  Source counts = 10.1 +/- 3.3
  Background counts = 0.9
  Rate = 0.0003 +/- 0.0001

[Mon May 13 23:21:29 2013] Off-axis axis estimate = 3.15'
[Tue May 14 00:18:41 2013] Using EEF radius (= 0.61 ")to estimate initial spatial extent for simple fitting
[Tue May 14 00:18:41 2013] Initial guess for spatial extent in simple fitting = 0.61"
[Tue May 14 00:18:41 2013] source mask rpix=1.2, npix_max = 12, mask sum = 9, frac = 0.742
[Tue May 14 00:18:41 2013] Giving source the simple spatial ID 9 for pass 0, mean size = 0.61"
[Tue May 14 00:28:51 2013] fullrun_ccd7_acisf12832_pi14-548_cl_pass0_src9.ximg exists
[Tue May 14 00:28:51 2013] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_ccd7_acisf12832_pi14-548_cl_pass0_src9.csv
[Tue May 14 00:28:51 2013] fullrun_ccd7_acisf12832_pi14-548_cl_pass0_src9_1.ximg exists
[Tue May 14 00:28:51 2013] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_ccd7_acisf12832_pi14-548_cl_pass0_src9.csv
[Tue May 14 00:28:51 2013] It looks like the fit did not converge
You should probably delete fullrun_ccd7_acisf12832_pi14-548_cl_pass0_src9_1.ximg
Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_ccd7_acisf12832_pi14-548_cl_pass0_src9.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes
[Tue May 14 00:28:51 2013] fullrun_ccd7_acisf12832_pi14-548_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src9.ximg exists
[Tue May 14 00:28:51 2013] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_ccd7_acisf12832_pi14-548_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src9.csv
[Tue May 14 00:28:51 2013] fullrun_ccd7_acisf12832_pi14-548_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src9_1.ximg exists
[Tue May 14 00:28:51 2013] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_ccd7_acisf12832_pi14-548_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src9.csv
[Tue May 14 00:28:51 2013] It looks like the fit did not converge
You should probably delete fullrun_ccd7_acisf12832_pi14-548_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src9_1.ximg
Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_ccd7_acisf12832_pi14-548_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src9.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes
[Tue May 14 00:28:55 2013] Spatial fit model total counts = 10.250800, observed total counts = 12.000000
[Tue May 14 00:28:55 2013] Offset between fit and detection position for source 10 = 1.079141 pixels
Spatial fit parameters:
  Offset between fit and detection position for source 10 = 1.079141 pixels
  Position = (554.0, 570.3) = 22 40 22.38 3 23 46.2
  Extent = 0.5 (0.4-0.6)", rotation angle = 0
  Source counts = 9.6 +/- 3.1
  Background counts = 0.0
  Rate = 0.0003 +/- 0.0001
[Tue May 14 00:28:55 2013] Vigneting correction estimate = 1.000000
[Tue May 14 00:28:55 2013] Source flux estimate in the 0.3-8.0 bandpass, Gamma=1.800000 = 0 
[Tue May 14 00:28:55 2013] Assessing source extent using major axis lower bound
[Tue May 14 00:28:55 2013] Source does appear to be extended
[Tue May 14 00:28:55 2013] Computing asymmetry using major and minor axis, asym = 1.00
[Tue May 14 00:51:33 2013] Using previous fit value to estimate initial spatial extent for simple fitting
[Tue May 14 00:51:33 2013] Initial guess for spatial extent in simple fitting = 0.49"
[Tue May 14 00:51:33 2013] Spatial fitting skipped for pass 1: source                                 has 9.6 net counts, is at off-axis angle 3.1'
[Tue May 14 01:01:22 2013] Vigneting correction estimate = 1.000000
[Tue May 14 01:01:22 2013] Source flux estimate in the 0.3-8.0 bandpass, Gamma=1.800000 = 0 
[Tue May 14 01:01:22 2013] Assessing source extent using major axis lower bound
[Tue May 14 01:01:22 2013] Source does appear to be extended
[Tue May 14 01:01:22 2013] Computing asymmetry using major and minor axis, asym = 1.00