[Mon May 13 23:21:05 2013] Detection parameters:
  Position = (674.4, 441.7) = 22 40 33.85 3 15 11.5
  Extent = 0.9" x 0.6", rotation angle = 131 degrees
  Source counts = 17.9 +/- 4.5
  Background counts = 2.1
  Rate = 0.0006 +/- 0.0002

[Mon May 13 23:21:06 2013] Off-axis axis estimate = 6.32'
[Tue May 14 00:13:57 2013] Using EEF radius (= 1.79 ")to estimate initial spatial extent for simple fitting
[Tue May 14 00:13:57 2013] Setting initial spatial extent for simple fitting to maximum allowed for this pass
[Tue May 14 00:13:57 2013] Initial guess for spatial extent in simple fitting = 1.79"
[Tue May 14 00:13:57 2013] source mask rpix=3.6, npix_max = 68, mask sum = 72, frac = 1.048
[Tue May 14 00:13:57 2013] Giving source the simple spatial ID 3 for pass 0, mean size = 1.79"
[Tue May 14 00:18:41 2013] fullrun_ccd6_acisf12832_pi14-548_cl_pass0_src3.ximg exists
[Tue May 14 00:18:41 2013] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_ccd6_acisf12832_pi14-548_cl_pass0_src3.csv
[Tue May 14 00:18:41 2013] fullrun_ccd6_acisf12832_pi14-548_cl_pass0_src3_1.ximg exists
[Tue May 14 00:18:41 2013] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_ccd6_acisf12832_pi14-548_cl_pass0_src3.csv
[Tue May 14 00:18:41 2013] It looks like the fit did not converge
You should probably delete fullrun_ccd6_acisf12832_pi14-548_cl_pass0_src3_1.ximg
Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_ccd6_acisf12832_pi14-548_cl_pass0_src3.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes
[Tue May 14 00:18:41 2013] fullrun_ccd6_acisf12832_pi14-548_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src3.ximg exists
[Tue May 14 00:18:41 2013] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_ccd6_acisf12832_pi14-548_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src3.csv
[Tue May 14 00:18:41 2013] fullrun_ccd6_acisf12832_pi14-548_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src3_1.ximg exists
[Tue May 14 00:18:41 2013] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_ccd6_acisf12832_pi14-548_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src3.csv
[Tue May 14 00:18:41 2013] It looks like the fit did not converge
You should probably delete fullrun_ccd6_acisf12832_pi14-548_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src3_1.ximg
Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_ccd6_acisf12832_pi14-548_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src3.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes
[Tue May 14 00:28:54 2013] Warning: source 3 in spatial fitting list does not appear to have a counterpart in memory, closest src. was src. 1 at 10.140040 pixels away
[Tue May 14 00:28:54 2013] Vigneting correction estimate = 1.000000
[Tue May 14 00:28:54 2013] Source flux estimate in the 0.3-8.0 bandpass, Gamma=1.800000 = 0 
[Tue May 14 00:28:54 2013] Assessing source extent using major
[Tue May 14 00:28:54 2013] Source does appear to be extended
[Tue May 14 00:28:54 2013] Computing asymmetry using major and minor axis, asym = 1.59
[Tue May 14 00:28:54 2013] Source is asymmetric
[Tue May 14 00:46:47 2013] Using EEF radius (= 1.79 ")to estimate initial spatial extent for simple fitting
[Tue May 14 00:46:47 2013] Setting initial spatial extent for simple fitting to maximum allowed for this pass
[Tue May 14 00:46:47 2013] Initial guess for spatial extent in simple fitting = 1.79"
[Tue May 14 00:46:47 2013] source mask rpix=3.6, npix_max = 68, mask sum = 72, frac = 1.048
[Tue May 14 00:46:47 2013] Giving source the simple spatial ID 3 for pass 1, mean size = 1.79"
[Tue May 14 00:51:33 2013] fullrun_ccd6_acisf12832_pi14-548_cl_pass1_src3.ximg exists
[Tue May 14 00:51:33 2013] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_ccd6_acisf12832_pi14-548_cl_pass1_src3.csv
[Tue May 14 00:51:33 2013] fullrun_ccd6_acisf12832_pi14-548_cl_pass1_src3_1.ximg exists
[Tue May 14 00:51:33 2013] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_ccd6_acisf12832_pi14-548_cl_pass1_src3.csv
[Tue May 14 00:51:33 2013] It looks like the fit did not converge
You should probably delete fullrun_ccd6_acisf12832_pi14-548_cl_pass1_src3_1.ximg
Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_ccd6_acisf12832_pi14-548_cl_pass1_src3.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes
[Tue May 14 00:51:33 2013] fullrun_ccd6_acisf12832_pi14-548_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src3.ximg exists
[Tue May 14 00:51:33 2013] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_ccd6_acisf12832_pi14-548_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src3.csv
[Tue May 14 00:51:33 2013] fullrun_ccd6_acisf12832_pi14-548_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src3_1.ximg exists
[Tue May 14 00:51:33 2013] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_ccd6_acisf12832_pi14-548_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src3.csv
[Tue May 14 00:51:33 2013] It looks like the fit did not converge
You should probably delete fullrun_ccd6_acisf12832_pi14-548_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src3_1.ximg
Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_ccd6_acisf12832_pi14-548_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src3.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes
[Tue May 14 01:01:21 2013] Warning: source 3 in spatial fitting list does not appear to have a counterpart in memory, closest src. was src. 1 at 12.544105 pixels away
[Tue May 14 01:01:21 2013] Vigneting correction estimate = 1.000000
[Tue May 14 01:01:21 2013] Source flux estimate in the 0.3-8.0 bandpass, Gamma=1.800000 = 0 
[Tue May 14 01:01:21 2013] Assessing source extent using major
[Tue May 14 01:01:21 2013] Source does appear to be extended
[Tue May 14 01:01:21 2013] Computing asymmetry using major and minor axis, asym = 1.59
[Tue May 14 01:01:21 2013] Source is asymmetric