[Sun Jan 22 02:21:53 2012] Detection parameters:
  Position = (904.3, 920.6) = 14 13 3.63 -65 20 39.6
  Extent = 0.5" x 0.5", rotation angle = 31 degrees
  Source counts = 35.2 +/- 7.5
  Background counts = 20.8
  Rate = 0.0002 +/- 5e-05

[Sun Jan 22 02:21:54 2012] Off-axis axis estimate = 0.62'
[Sun Jan 22 06:59:08 2012] Using EEF radius (= 0.39 ")to estimate initial spatial extent for simple fitting
[Sun Jan 22 06:59:08 2012] Initial guess for spatial extent in simple fitting = 0.39"
[Sun Jan 22 06:59:08 2012] source mask rpix=0.8, npix_max = 6, mask sum = 9, frac = 1.358
[Sun Jan 22 06:59:08 2012] Giving source the simple spatial ID 62 for pass 0, mean size = 0.39"
[Sun Jan 22 08:58:31 2012] fullrun_ccd7_acisf12823_pi14-548_cl_pass0_src62.ximg exists
[Sun Jan 22 08:58:31 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_ccd7_acisf12823_pi14-548_cl_pass0_src62.csv
[Sun Jan 22 08:58:31 2012] fullrun_ccd7_acisf12823_pi14-548_cl_pass0_src62_1.ximg exists
[Sun Jan 22 08:58:31 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_ccd7_acisf12823_pi14-548_cl_pass0_src62.csv
[Sun Jan 22 08:58:31 2012] It looks like the fit did not converge
You should probably delete fullrun_ccd7_acisf12823_pi14-548_cl_pass0_src62_1.ximg
Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_ccd7_acisf12823_pi14-548_cl_pass0_src62.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes
[Sun Jan 22 08:58:32 2012] fullrun_ccd7_acisf12823_pi14-548_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src62.ximg exists
[Sun Jan 22 08:58:32 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_ccd7_acisf12823_pi14-548_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src62.csv
[Sun Jan 22 08:58:32 2012] fullrun_ccd7_acisf12823_pi14-548_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src62_1.ximg exists
[Sun Jan 22 08:58:32 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_ccd7_acisf12823_pi14-548_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src62.csv
[Sun Jan 22 08:58:32 2012] It looks like the fit did not converge
You should probably delete fullrun_ccd7_acisf12823_pi14-548_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src62_1.ximg
Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_ccd7_acisf12823_pi14-548_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src62.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes
[Sun Jan 22 08:59:00 2012] Spatial fit model total counts = 72.417000, observed total counts = 227.000000
[Sun Jan 22 08:59:00 2012] Poor agreement between spatial fit and data for source 69
It may help to tweak spatial fit manually
Not incorporating fit results
[Sun Jan 22 08:59:01 2012] Vigneting correction estimate = 1.000000
[Sun Jan 22 08:59:01 2012] Source flux estimate in the 0.3-8.0 bandpass, Gamma=1.800000 = 0 
[Sun Jan 22 08:59:01 2012] Assessing source extent using major
[Sun Jan 22 08:59:01 2012] Source does appear to be extended
[Sun Jan 22 08:59:01 2012] Computing asymmetry using major and minor axis, asym = 1.00
[Sun Jan 22 11:49:04 2012] Using EEF radius (= 0.39 ")to estimate initial spatial extent for simple fitting
[Sun Jan 22 11:49:04 2012] Initial guess for spatial extent in simple fitting = 0.39"
[Sun Jan 22 11:49:04 2012] source mask rpix=0.8, npix_max = 6, mask sum = 9, frac = 1.358
[Sun Jan 22 11:49:04 2012] Giving source the simple spatial ID 59 for pass 1, mean size = 0.39"
[Sun Jan 22 13:11:11 2012] fullrun_ccd7_acisf12823_pi14-548_cl_pass1_src59.ximg exists
[Sun Jan 22 13:11:11 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_ccd7_acisf12823_pi14-548_cl_pass1_src59.csv
[Sun Jan 22 13:11:11 2012] fullrun_ccd7_acisf12823_pi14-548_cl_pass1_src59_1.ximg exists
[Sun Jan 22 13:11:11 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_ccd7_acisf12823_pi14-548_cl_pass1_src59.csv
[Sun Jan 22 13:11:11 2012] It looks like the fit did not converge
You should probably delete fullrun_ccd7_acisf12823_pi14-548_cl_pass1_src59_1.ximg
Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_ccd7_acisf12823_pi14-548_cl_pass1_src59.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes
[Sun Jan 22 13:11:11 2012] fullrun_ccd7_acisf12823_pi14-548_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src59.ximg exists
[Sun Jan 22 13:11:11 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_ccd7_acisf12823_pi14-548_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src59.csv
[Sun Jan 22 13:11:11 2012] fullrun_ccd7_acisf12823_pi14-548_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src59_1.ximg exists
[Sun Jan 22 13:11:11 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_ccd7_acisf12823_pi14-548_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src59.csv
[Sun Jan 22 13:11:11 2012] It looks like the fit did not converge
You should probably delete fullrun_ccd7_acisf12823_pi14-548_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src59_1.ximg
Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_ccd7_acisf12823_pi14-548_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src59.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes
[Sun Jan 22 13:11:31 2012] Spatial fit model total counts = 48.148800, observed total counts = 227.000000
[Sun Jan 22 13:11:31 2012] Poor agreement between spatial fit and data for source 69
It may help to tweak spatial fit manually
Not incorporating fit results
[Sun Jan 22 13:11:31 2012] Warning: source 61 in spatial fitting list does not appear to have a counterpart in memory, closest src. was src. 69 at 232.255233 pixels away
[Sun Jan 22 13:11:31 2012] Vigneting correction estimate = 1.000000
[Sun Jan 22 13:11:31 2012] Source flux estimate in the 0.3-8.0 bandpass, Gamma=1.800000 = 0 
[Sun Jan 22 13:11:31 2012] Assessing source extent using major
[Sun Jan 22 13:11:31 2012] Source does appear to be extended
[Sun Jan 22 13:11:31 2012] Computing asymmetry using major and minor axis, asym = 1.00
[Sun Jan 22 13:11:31 2012] Deleting source due to low Poisson probability 0.9