[Wed Feb 29 01:47:43 2012] Detection parameters:
  Position = (775.4, 1316.1) = 11 15 8.08 -61 16 3.1
  Extent = 0.5" x 0.5", rotation angle = 83 degrees
  Source counts = 20.7 +/- 6.1
  Background counts = 16.3
  Rate = 0.0002 +/- 7e-05

[Wed Feb 29 01:47:48 2012] Off-axis axis estimate = 0.86'
[Wed Feb 29 05:01:41 2012] Using EEF radius (= 0.38 ")to estimate initial spatial extent for simple fitting
[Wed Feb 29 05:01:41 2012] Initial guess for spatial extent in simple fitting = 0.38"
[Wed Feb 29 05:01:41 2012] source mask rpix=0.8, npix_max = 6, mask sum = 6, frac = 0.924
[Wed Feb 29 05:01:41 2012] Giving source the simple spatial ID 93 for pass 0, mean size = 0.38"
[Wed Feb 29 07:33:39 2012] fullrun_ccd3_acisf12330_pi14-548_cl_pass0_src93.ximg exists
[Wed Feb 29 07:33:39 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_ccd3_acisf12330_pi14-548_cl_pass0_src93.csv
[Wed Feb 29 07:33:39 2012] fullrun_ccd3_acisf12330_pi14-548_cl_pass0_src93_1.ximg exists
[Wed Feb 29 07:33:39 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_ccd3_acisf12330_pi14-548_cl_pass0_src93.csv
[Wed Feb 29 07:33:39 2012] It looks like the fit did not converge
You should probably delete fullrun_ccd3_acisf12330_pi14-548_cl_pass0_src93_1.ximg
Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_ccd3_acisf12330_pi14-548_cl_pass0_src93.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes
[Wed Feb 29 07:33:40 2012] fullrun_ccd3_acisf12330_pi14-548_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src93.ximg exists
[Wed Feb 29 07:33:40 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_ccd3_acisf12330_pi14-548_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src93.csv
[Wed Feb 29 07:33:40 2012] fullrun_ccd3_acisf12330_pi14-548_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src93_1.ximg exists
[Wed Feb 29 07:33:40 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_ccd3_acisf12330_pi14-548_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src93.csv
[Wed Feb 29 07:33:40 2012] It looks like the fit did not converge
You should probably delete fullrun_ccd3_acisf12330_pi14-548_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src93_1.ximg
Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_ccd3_acisf12330_pi14-548_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src93.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes
[Wed Feb 29 08:15:25 2012] Spatial fit model total counts = 89.227100, observed total counts = 352.000000
[Wed Feb 29 08:15:25 2012] Poor agreement between spatial fit and data for source 106
It may help to tweak spatial fit manually
Not incorporating fit results
[Wed Feb 29 08:15:26 2012] Vigneting correction estimate = 1.000000
[Wed Feb 29 08:15:26 2012] Source flux estimate in the 0.3-8.0 bandpass, Gamma=1.800000 = 0 
[Wed Feb 29 08:15:26 2012] Assessing source extent using major
[Wed Feb 29 08:15:26 2012] Source does appear to be extended
[Wed Feb 29 08:15:26 2012] Computing asymmetry using major and minor axis, asym = 1.07
[Wed Feb 29 10:57:52 2012] Using EEF radius (= 0.38 ")to estimate initial spatial extent for simple fitting
[Wed Feb 29 10:57:52 2012] Initial guess for spatial extent in simple fitting = 0.38"
[Wed Feb 29 10:57:52 2012] source mask rpix=0.8, npix_max = 6, mask sum = 6, frac = 0.924
[Wed Feb 29 10:57:52 2012] Giving source the simple spatial ID 87 for pass 1, mean size = 0.38"
[Wed Feb 29 13:24:23 2012] fullrun_ccd3_acisf12330_pi14-548_cl_pass1_src87.ximg exists
[Wed Feb 29 13:24:23 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_ccd3_acisf12330_pi14-548_cl_pass1_src87.csv
[Wed Feb 29 13:24:23 2012] fullrun_ccd3_acisf12330_pi14-548_cl_pass1_src87_1.ximg exists
[Wed Feb 29 13:24:23 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_ccd3_acisf12330_pi14-548_cl_pass1_src87.csv
[Wed Feb 29 13:24:23 2012] It looks like the fit did not converge
You should probably delete fullrun_ccd3_acisf12330_pi14-548_cl_pass1_src87_1.ximg
Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_ccd3_acisf12330_pi14-548_cl_pass1_src87.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes
[Wed Feb 29 13:24:24 2012] fullrun_ccd3_acisf12330_pi14-548_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src87.ximg exists
[Wed Feb 29 13:24:24 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_ccd3_acisf12330_pi14-548_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src87.csv
[Wed Feb 29 13:24:24 2012] fullrun_ccd3_acisf12330_pi14-548_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src87_1.ximg exists
[Wed Feb 29 13:24:24 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_ccd3_acisf12330_pi14-548_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src87.csv
[Wed Feb 29 13:24:24 2012] It looks like the fit did not converge
You should probably delete fullrun_ccd3_acisf12330_pi14-548_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src87_1.ximg
Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_ccd3_acisf12330_pi14-548_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src87.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes
[Wed Feb 29 14:05:52 2012] Spatial fit model total counts = 146.405000, observed total counts = 352.000000
[Wed Feb 29 14:05:52 2012] Poor agreement between spatial fit and data for source 106
It may help to tweak spatial fit manually
Not incorporating fit results
[Wed Feb 29 14:05:52 2012] Vigneting correction estimate = 1.000000
[Wed Feb 29 14:05:52 2012] Source flux estimate in the 0.3-8.0 bandpass, Gamma=1.800000 = 0 
[Wed Feb 29 14:05:52 2012] Assessing source extent using major
[Wed Feb 29 14:05:52 2012] Source does appear to be extended
[Wed Feb 29 14:05:52 2012] Computing asymmetry using major and minor axis, asym = 1.07
[Wed Feb 29 14:05:52 2012] Deleting source due to low Poisson probability 1.0