[Mon Oct 3 07:09:31 2011] Detection parameters: Position = (482.4, 1017.4) = 16 17 44.13 -51 5 26.5 Extent = 0.5" x 0.5", rotation angle = 17 degrees Source counts = 54.7 +/- 12.5 Background counts = 101.3 Rate = 0.003 +/- 0.0007 [Mon Oct 3 07:09:33 2011] Off-axis axis estimate = 4.00' [Mon Oct 3 07:12:12 2011] Using EEF radius (= 0.83 ")to estimate initial spatial extent for simple fitting [Mon Oct 3 07:12:12 2011] Initial guess for spatial extent in simple fitting = 0.83" [Mon Oct 3 07:12:12 2011] source mask rpix=1.7, npix_max = 19, mask sum = 25, frac = 1.307 [Mon Oct 3 07:12:12 2011] Giving source the simple spatial ID 33 for pass 0, mean size = 0.83" [Mon Oct 3 07:12:15 2011] fullrun_ccd0_acisf12224_pi14-548_cl_pass0_src33.ximg exists [Mon Oct 3 07:12:15 2011] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_ccd0_acisf12224_pi14-548_cl_pass0_src33.csv [Mon Oct 3 07:12:15 2011] fullrun_ccd0_acisf12224_pi14-548_cl_pass0_src33_1.ximg exists [Mon Oct 3 07:12:15 2011] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_ccd0_acisf12224_pi14-548_cl_pass0_src33.csv [Mon Oct 3 07:12:15 2011] It looks like the fit did not converge You should probably delete fullrun_ccd0_acisf12224_pi14-548_cl_pass0_src33_1.ximg Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_ccd0_acisf12224_pi14-548_cl_pass0_src33.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes [Mon Oct 3 07:12:21 2011] fullrun_ccd0_acisf12224_pi14-548_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src33.ximg exists [Mon Oct 3 07:12:21 2011] fullrun_ccd0_acisf12224_pi14-548_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src33_1.ximg exists [Mon Oct 3 07:12:21 2011] Fit fullrun_ccd0_acisf12224_pi14-548_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src33 appears to have run properly [Mon Oct 3 07:13:13 2011] Source 55 is offset by 0.477449 and 4.889248 pixels which is larger than 2 X fitted extent = 0.843508 x 0.843508, not incorporating fit results [Mon Oct 3 07:13:13 2011] Vigneting correction estimate = 1.000000 [Mon Oct 3 07:13:13 2011] Source flux estimate in the 0.3-8.0 bandpass, Gamma=1.800000 = 0 [Mon Oct 3 07:13:13 2011] Assessing source extent using major [Mon Oct 3 07:13:13 2011] Source does appear to be extended [Mon Oct 3 07:13:13 2011] Computing asymmetry using major and minor axis, asym = 1.03 [Mon Oct 3 07:13:55 2011] Using EEF radius (= 0.83 ")to estimate initial spatial extent for simple fitting [Mon Oct 3 07:13:55 2011] Initial guess for spatial extent in simple fitting = 0.83" [Mon Oct 3 07:13:55 2011] source mask rpix=1.7, npix_max = 19, mask sum = 25, frac = 1.307 [Mon Oct 3 07:13:55 2011] Giving source the simple spatial ID 22 for pass 1, mean size = 0.83" [Mon Oct 3 07:13:58 2011] fullrun_ccd0_acisf12224_pi14-548_cl_pass1_src22.ximg exists [Mon Oct 3 07:13:58 2011] fullrun_ccd0_acisf12224_pi14-548_cl_pass1_src22_1.ximg exists [Mon Oct 3 07:13:58 2011] Fit fullrun_ccd0_acisf12224_pi14-548_cl_pass1_src22 appears to have run properly [Mon Oct 3 07:13:59 2011] fullrun_ccd0_acisf12224_pi14-548_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src22.ximg exists [Mon Oct 3 07:13:59 2011] fullrun_ccd0_acisf12224_pi14-548_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src22_1.ximg exists [Mon Oct 3 07:13:59 2011] Fit fullrun_ccd0_acisf12224_pi14-548_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src22 appears to have run properly [Mon Oct 3 07:14:27 2011] Warning: source 5 in spatial fitting list does not appear to have a counterpart in memory, closest src. was src. 55 at 130.284152 pixels away [Mon Oct 3 07:14:27 2011] Spatial fit model total counts = 611.366000, observed total counts = 611.000000 [Mon Oct 3 07:14:27 2011] Offset between fit and detection position for source 55 = 0.878005 pixels [Mon Oct 3 07:14:27 2011] 611.152500 total counts/ 582.358000 bgd. counts: snr = 1.193204 Spatial fit parameters: Offset between fit and detection position for source 55 = 0.878005 pixels Position = (482.8, 1016.6) = 16 17 44.14 -51 5 27.1 Extent = 1.7 (1.7-3.3)" x 0.2 (0.2-0.5)", rotation angle = 110 (94-120) degrees Source counts = 28.8 +/- 24.7 Background counts = 582.4 Rate = 0.002 +/- 0.001 Deleting source due to low Poisson probability