[Mon Oct 10 13:18:39 2011] Detection parameters:
  Position = (328.3, 839.4) = 20 32 44.85 40 57 16.3
  Extent = 0.8" x 0.6", rotation angle = 120 degrees
  Source counts = 24.1 +/- 5.7
  Background counts = 8.9
  Rate = 0.004 +/- 0.001

[Mon Oct 10 13:18:39 2011] Off-axis axis estimate = 7.13'
[Mon Oct 10 13:19:32 2011] Using EEF radius (= 2.26 ")to estimate initial spatial extent for simple fitting
[Mon Oct 10 13:19:32 2011] Initial guess for spatial extent in simple fitting = 2.26"
[Mon Oct 10 13:19:32 2011] source mask rpix=4.6, npix_max = 103, mask sum = 100, frac = 0.965
[Mon Oct 10 13:19:32 2011] Giving source the simple spatial ID 62 for pass 0, mean size = 2.26"
[Mon Oct 10 13:19:34 2011] fullrun_ccd0_acisf12099_pi14-548_cl_pass0_src62.ximg exists
[Mon Oct 10 13:19:34 2011] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_ccd0_acisf12099_pi14-548_cl_pass0_src62.csv
[Mon Oct 10 13:19:34 2011] fullrun_ccd0_acisf12099_pi14-548_cl_pass0_src62_1.ximg exists
[Mon Oct 10 13:19:34 2011] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_ccd0_acisf12099_pi14-548_cl_pass0_src62.csv
[Mon Oct 10 13:19:34 2011] It looks like the fit did not converge
You should probably delete fullrun_ccd0_acisf12099_pi14-548_cl_pass0_src62_1.ximg
Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_ccd0_acisf12099_pi14-548_cl_pass0_src62.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes
[Mon Oct 10 13:19:36 2011] fullrun_ccd0_acisf12099_pi14-548_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src62.ximg exists
[Mon Oct 10 13:19:36 2011] fullrun_ccd0_acisf12099_pi14-548_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src62_1.ximg exists
[Mon Oct 10 13:19:36 2011] Fit fullrun_ccd0_acisf12099_pi14-548_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src62 appears to have run properly
[Mon Oct 10 13:19:50 2011] Warning: source 62 in spatial fitting list does not appear to have a counterpart in memory, closest src. was src. 62 at 24.976645 pixels away
[Mon Oct 10 13:19:50 2011] Vigneting correction estimate = 1.000000
[Mon Oct 10 13:19:50 2011] Source flux estimate in the 0.3-8.0 bandpass, Gamma=1.800000 = 0 
[Mon Oct 10 13:19:50 2011] Assessing source extent using major
[Mon Oct 10 13:19:50 2011] Source does appear to be extended
[Mon Oct 10 13:19:50 2011] Computing asymmetry using major and minor axis, asym = 1.32
[Mon Oct 10 13:20:10 2011] Using EEF radius (= 2.26 ")to estimate initial spatial extent for simple fitting
[Mon Oct 10 13:20:10 2011] Initial guess for spatial extent in simple fitting = 2.26"
[Mon Oct 10 13:20:10 2011] source mask rpix=4.6, npix_max = 103, mask sum = 100, frac = 0.965
[Mon Oct 10 13:20:10 2011] Giving source the simple spatial ID 62 for pass 1, mean size = 2.26"
[Mon Oct 10 13:20:12 2011] fullrun_ccd0_acisf12099_pi14-548_cl_pass1_src62.ximg exists
[Mon Oct 10 13:20:12 2011] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_ccd0_acisf12099_pi14-548_cl_pass1_src62.csv
[Mon Oct 10 13:20:12 2011] fullrun_ccd0_acisf12099_pi14-548_cl_pass1_src62_1.ximg exists
[Mon Oct 10 13:20:12 2011] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_ccd0_acisf12099_pi14-548_cl_pass1_src62.csv
[Mon Oct 10 13:20:12 2011] It looks like the fit did not converge
You should probably delete fullrun_ccd0_acisf12099_pi14-548_cl_pass1_src62_1.ximg
Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_ccd0_acisf12099_pi14-548_cl_pass1_src62.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes
[Mon Oct 10 13:20:14 2011] fullrun_ccd0_acisf12099_pi14-548_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src62.ximg exists
[Mon Oct 10 13:20:14 2011] fullrun_ccd0_acisf12099_pi14-548_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src62_1.ximg exists
[Mon Oct 10 13:20:14 2011] Fit fullrun_ccd0_acisf12099_pi14-548_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src62 appears to have run properly
[Mon Oct 10 13:20:28 2011] Warning: source 12 in spatial fitting list does not appear to have a counterpart in memory, closest src. was src. 62 at 74.609528 pixels away
[Mon Oct 10 13:20:28 2011] Warning: source 39 in spatial fitting list does not appear to have a counterpart in memory, closest src. was src. 62 at 81.402497 pixels away
[Mon Oct 10 13:20:28 2011] Warning: source 62 in spatial fitting list does not appear to have a counterpart in memory, closest src. was src. 62 at 24.976645 pixels away
[Mon Oct 10 13:20:28 2011] Vigneting correction estimate = 1.000000
[Mon Oct 10 13:20:28 2011] Source flux estimate in the 0.3-8.0 bandpass, Gamma=1.800000 = 0 
[Mon Oct 10 13:20:28 2011] Assessing source extent using major
[Mon Oct 10 13:20:28 2011] Source does appear to be extended
[Mon Oct 10 13:20:28 2011] Computing asymmetry using major and minor axis, asym = 1.32
[Mon Oct 10 13:20:28 2011] Deleting source due to low Poisson probability 1.0