[Sat Oct  1 16:53:07 2011] Detection parameters:
  Position = (260.5, 657.2) = 11 18 14.48 7 44 49.3
  Extent = 0.5" x 0.5", rotation angle = 95 degrees
  Source counts = 11.5 +/- 3.5
  Background counts = 0.5
  Rate = 0.0008 +/- 0.0002

[Sat Oct  1 16:53:08 2011] Off-axis axis estimate = 1.53'
[Sat Oct  1 16:53:48 2011] Using EEF radius (= 0.39 ")to estimate initial spatial extent for simple fitting
[Sat Oct  1 16:53:48 2011] Initial guess for spatial extent in simple fitting = 0.39"
[Sat Oct  1 16:53:48 2011] source mask rpix=0.8, npix_max = 6, mask sum = 6, frac = 0.887
[Sat Oct  1 16:53:48 2011] Giving source the simple spatial ID 4 for pass 0, mean size = 0.39"
[Sat Oct  1 16:53:49 2011] fullrun_ccd7_acisf11857_pi14-548_cl_pass0_src4.ximg exists
[Sat Oct  1 16:53:49 2011] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_ccd7_acisf11857_pi14-548_cl_pass0_src4.csv
[Sat Oct  1 16:53:49 2011] fullrun_ccd7_acisf11857_pi14-548_cl_pass0_src4_1.ximg exists
[Sat Oct  1 16:53:49 2011] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_ccd7_acisf11857_pi14-548_cl_pass0_src4.csv
[Sat Oct  1 16:53:49 2011] It looks like the fit did not converge
You should probably delete fullrun_ccd7_acisf11857_pi14-548_cl_pass0_src4_1.ximg
Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_ccd7_acisf11857_pi14-548_cl_pass0_src4.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes
[Sat Oct  1 16:53:49 2011] fullrun_ccd7_acisf11857_pi14-548_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src4.ximg exists
[Sat Oct  1 16:53:50 2011] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_ccd7_acisf11857_pi14-548_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src4.csv
[Sat Oct  1 16:53:50 2011] fullrun_ccd7_acisf11857_pi14-548_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src4_1.ximg exists
[Sat Oct  1 16:53:50 2011] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_ccd7_acisf11857_pi14-548_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src4.csv
[Sat Oct  1 16:53:50 2011] It looks like the fit did not converge
You should probably delete fullrun_ccd7_acisf11857_pi14-548_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src4_1.ximg
Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_ccd7_acisf11857_pi14-548_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src4.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes
[Sat Oct  1 16:53:53 2011] Spatial fit model total counts = 12.914300, observed total counts = 14.000000
[Sat Oct  1 16:53:53 2011] Offset between fit and detection position for source 2 = 0.536252 pixels
[Sat Oct  1 16:53:53 2011] 13.566130 total counts/ 2.684330 bgd. counts: snr = 6.641754
Spatial fit parameters:
  Offset between fit and detection position for source 2 = 0.536252 pixels
  Position = (261.0, 657.4) = 11 18 14.48 7 44 49.1
  Extent = 0.4 (0.3-0.4)", rotation angle = 0
  Source counts = 10.9 +/- 3.7
  Background counts = 2.7
  Rate = 0.0007 +/- 0.0003
[Sat Oct  1 16:53:53 2011] Vigneting correction estimate = 1.000000
[Sat Oct  1 16:53:53 2011] Source flux estimate in the 0.3-8.0 bandpass, Gamma=1.800000 = 0 
[Sat Oct  1 16:53:53 2011] Assessing source extent using major axis lower bound
[Sat Oct  1 16:53:53 2011] Source does appear to be extended
[Sat Oct  1 16:53:53 2011] Computing asymmetry using major and minor axis, asym = 1.00
[Sat Oct  1 16:54:03 2011] Using previous fit value to estimate initial spatial extent for simple fitting
[Sat Oct  1 16:54:03 2011] Initial guess for spatial extent in simple fitting = 0.36"
[Sat Oct  1 16:54:03 2011] source mask rpix=0.7, npix_max = 6, mask sum = 6, frac = 0.979
[Sat Oct  1 16:54:03 2011] Giving source the simple spatial ID 4 for pass 1, mean size = 0.36"
[Sat Oct  1 16:54:04 2011] fullrun_ccd7_acisf11857_pi14-548_cl_pass1_src4.ximg exists
[Sat Oct  1 16:54:04 2011] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_ccd7_acisf11857_pi14-548_cl_pass1_src4.csv
[Sat Oct  1 16:54:04 2011] fullrun_ccd7_acisf11857_pi14-548_cl_pass1_src4_1.ximg exists
[Sat Oct  1 16:54:04 2011] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_ccd7_acisf11857_pi14-548_cl_pass1_src4.csv
[Sat Oct  1 16:54:04 2011] It looks like the fit did not converge
You should probably delete fullrun_ccd7_acisf11857_pi14-548_cl_pass1_src4_1.ximg
Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_ccd7_acisf11857_pi14-548_cl_pass1_src4.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes
[Sat Oct  1 16:54:04 2011] fullrun_ccd7_acisf11857_pi14-548_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src4.ximg exists
[Sat Oct  1 16:54:04 2011] fullrun_ccd7_acisf11857_pi14-548_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src4_1.ximg exists
[Sat Oct  1 16:54:04 2011] Fit fullrun_ccd7_acisf11857_pi14-548_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src4 appears to have run properly
[Sat Oct  1 16:54:08 2011] Spatial fit model total counts = 13.311200, observed total counts = 14.000000
[Sat Oct  1 16:54:08 2011] Offset between fit and detection position for source 2 = 0.000376 pixels
[Sat Oct  1 16:54:08 2011] 13.757720 total counts/ 2.977820 bgd. counts: snr = 6.246914
Spatial fit parameters:
  Offset between fit and detection position for source 2 = 0.000376 pixels
  Position = (261.0, 657.4) = 11 18 14.48 7 44 49.1
  Extent = 0.4 (0.3-0.5)", rotation angle = 0
  Source counts = 10.8 +/- 3.7
  Background counts = 3.0
  Rate = 0.0007 +/- 0.0003
[Sat Oct  1 16:54:08 2011] Vigneting correction estimate = 1.000000
[Sat Oct  1 16:54:08 2011] Source flux estimate in the 0.3-8.0 bandpass, Gamma=1.800000 = 0 
[Sat Oct  1 16:54:08 2011] Assessing source extent using major axis lower bound
[Sat Oct  1 16:54:08 2011] Source does appear to be extended
[Sat Oct  1 16:54:08 2011] Computing asymmetry using major and minor axis, asym = 1.00
[Sat Oct  1 16:54:08 2011] Deleting source due to low Poisson probability 1.0