[Mon Oct 31 13:12:30 2011] Detection parameters: Position = (801.9, 508.2) = 2 26 33.25 -18 47 30.2 Extent = 3.3" x 2.4", rotation angle = 108 degrees Source counts = 23.5 +/- 6.6 Background counts = 19.5 Rate = 0.0003 +/- 8e-05 [Mon Oct 31 13:12:30 2011] Off-axis axis estimate = 10.19' [Mon Oct 31 13:13:43 2011] Using EEF radius (= 4.60 ")to estimate initial spatial extent for simple fitting [Mon Oct 31 13:13:43 2011] Initial guess for spatial extent in simple fitting = 4.60" [Mon Oct 31 13:13:43 2011] source mask rpix=9.4, npix_max = 388, mask sum = 400, frac = 1.029 [Mon Oct 31 13:13:43 2011] Giving source the simple spatial ID 5 for pass 0, mean size = 4.60" [Mon Oct 31 13:13:43 2011] fullrun_ccd2_acisf11829_pi14-548_cl_pass0_src5.ximg exists [Mon Oct 31 13:13:43 2011] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_ccd2_acisf11829_pi14-548_cl_pass0_src5.csv [Mon Oct 31 13:13:43 2011] fullrun_ccd2_acisf11829_pi14-548_cl_pass0_src5_1.ximg exists [Mon Oct 31 13:13:43 2011] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_ccd2_acisf11829_pi14-548_cl_pass0_src5.csv [Mon Oct 31 13:13:43 2011] It looks like the fit did not converge You should probably delete fullrun_ccd2_acisf11829_pi14-548_cl_pass0_src5_1.ximg Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_ccd2_acisf11829_pi14-548_cl_pass0_src5.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes [Mon Oct 31 13:13:44 2011] fullrun_ccd2_acisf11829_pi14-548_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src5.ximg exists [Mon Oct 31 13:13:44 2011] fullrun_ccd2_acisf11829_pi14-548_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src5_1.ximg exists [Mon Oct 31 13:13:44 2011] Fit fullrun_ccd2_acisf11829_pi14-548_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src5 appears to have run properly [Mon Oct 31 13:13:51 2011] Warning: source 5 in spatial fitting list does not appear to have a counterpart in memory, closest src. was src. 7 at 50.497451 pixels away [Mon Oct 31 13:13:51 2011] Vigneting correction estimate = 1.000000 [Mon Oct 31 13:13:51 2011] Source flux estimate in the 0.3-8.0 bandpass, Gamma=1.800000 = 0 [Mon Oct 31 13:13:51 2011] Assessing source extent using major [Mon Oct 31 13:13:51 2011] Source does appear to be extended [Mon Oct 31 13:13:51 2011] Computing asymmetry using major and minor axis, asym = 1.41 [Mon Oct 31 13:14:14 2011] Using EEF radius (= 4.60 ")to estimate initial spatial extent for simple fitting [Mon Oct 31 13:14:14 2011] Initial guess for spatial extent in simple fitting = 4.60" [Mon Oct 31 13:14:14 2011] source mask rpix=9.4, npix_max = 388, mask sum = 400, frac = 1.029 [Mon Oct 31 13:14:14 2011] Giving source the simple spatial ID 4 for pass 1, mean size = 4.60" [Mon Oct 31 13:14:15 2011] fullrun_ccd2_acisf11829_pi14-548_cl_pass1_src4.ximg exists [Mon Oct 31 13:14:15 2011] fullrun_ccd2_acisf11829_pi14-548_cl_pass1_src4_1.ximg exists [Mon Oct 31 13:14:15 2011] Fit fullrun_ccd2_acisf11829_pi14-548_cl_pass1_src4 appears to have run properly [Mon Oct 31 13:14:15 2011] fullrun_ccd2_acisf11829_pi14-548_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src4.ximg exists [Mon Oct 31 13:14:15 2011] fullrun_ccd2_acisf11829_pi14-548_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src4_1.ximg exists [Mon Oct 31 13:14:15 2011] Fit fullrun_ccd2_acisf11829_pi14-548_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src4 appears to have run properly [Mon Oct 31 13:14:22 2011] Warning: source 2 in spatial fitting list does not appear to have a counterpart in memory, closest src. was src. 7 at 415.004971 pixels away [Mon Oct 31 13:14:22 2011] Warning: source 4 in spatial fitting list does not appear to have a counterpart in memory, closest src. was src. 7 at 51.729939 pixels away [Mon Oct 31 13:14:22 2011] Vigneting correction estimate = 1.000000 [Mon Oct 31 13:14:22 2011] Source flux estimate in the 0.3-8.0 bandpass, Gamma=1.800000 = 0 [Mon Oct 31 13:14:22 2011] Assessing source extent using major [Mon Oct 31 13:14:22 2011] Source does appear to be extended [Mon Oct 31 13:14:22 2011] Computing asymmetry using major and minor axis, asym = 1.41 [Mon Oct 31 13:14:22 2011] Deleting source due to low Poisson probability 1.0