[Thu Oct  6 20:23:17 2011] Detection parameters:
  Position = (464.2, 631.4) = 16 17 16.22 -51 5 7.4
  Extent = 0.7" x 0.6", rotation angle = 48 degrees
  Source counts = 40.5 +/- 10.4
  Background counts = 68.5
  Rate = 0.0006 +/- 0.0002

[Thu Oct  6 20:23:24 2011] Off-axis axis estimate = 5.53'
[Thu Oct  6 20:30:35 2011] Using EEF radius (= 1.41 ")to estimate initial spatial extent for simple fitting
[Thu Oct  6 20:30:35 2011] Initial guess for spatial extent in simple fitting = 1.41"
[Thu Oct  6 20:30:35 2011] source mask rpix=2.9, npix_max = 45, mask sum = 49, frac = 1.086
[Thu Oct  6 20:30:35 2011] Giving source the simple spatial ID 97 for pass 0, mean size = 1.41"
[Thu Oct  6 20:30:39 2011] fullrun_ccd1_acisf11823_pi14-548_cl_pass0_src97.ximg exists
[Thu Oct  6 20:30:39 2011] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_ccd1_acisf11823_pi14-548_cl_pass0_src97.csv
[Thu Oct  6 20:30:39 2011] fullrun_ccd1_acisf11823_pi14-548_cl_pass0_src97_1.ximg exists
[Thu Oct  6 20:30:39 2011] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_ccd1_acisf11823_pi14-548_cl_pass0_src97.csv
[Thu Oct  6 20:30:39 2011] It looks like the fit did not converge
You should probably delete fullrun_ccd1_acisf11823_pi14-548_cl_pass0_src97_1.ximg
Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_ccd1_acisf11823_pi14-548_cl_pass0_src97.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes
[Thu Oct  6 20:30:41 2011] fullrun_ccd1_acisf11823_pi14-548_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src97.ximg exists
[Thu Oct  6 20:30:41 2011] fullrun_ccd1_acisf11823_pi14-548_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src97_1.ximg exists
[Thu Oct  6 20:30:41 2011] Fit fullrun_ccd1_acisf11823_pi14-548_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src97 appears to have run properly
[Thu Oct  6 20:31:45 2011] Warning: source 97 in spatial fitting list does not appear to have a counterpart in memory, closest src. was src. 155 at 16.407065 pixels away
[Thu Oct  6 20:31:45 2011] Vigneting correction estimate = 1.000000
[Thu Oct  6 20:31:45 2011] Source flux estimate in the 0.3-8.0 bandpass, Gamma=1.800000 = 0 
[Thu Oct  6 20:31:45 2011] Assessing source extent using major
[Thu Oct  6 20:31:45 2011] Source does appear to be extended
[Thu Oct  6 20:31:45 2011] Computing asymmetry using major and minor axis, asym = 1.18
[Thu Oct  6 20:32:52 2011] Using EEF radius (= 1.41 ")to estimate initial spatial extent for simple fitting
[Thu Oct  6 20:32:52 2011] Initial guess for spatial extent in simple fitting = 1.41"
[Thu Oct  6 20:32:52 2011] source mask rpix=2.9, npix_max = 45, mask sum = 49, frac = 1.086
[Thu Oct  6 20:32:52 2011] Giving source the simple spatial ID 84 for pass 1, mean size = 1.41"
[Thu Oct  6 20:32:58 2011] fullrun_ccd1_acisf11823_pi14-548_cl_pass1_src84.ximg exists
[Thu Oct  6 20:32:58 2011] fullrun_ccd1_acisf11823_pi14-548_cl_pass1_src84_1.ximg exists
[Thu Oct  6 20:32:58 2011] Fit fullrun_ccd1_acisf11823_pi14-548_cl_pass1_src84 appears to have run properly
[Thu Oct  6 20:33:01 2011] fullrun_ccd1_acisf11823_pi14-548_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src84.ximg exists
[Thu Oct  6 20:33:01 2011] fullrun_ccd1_acisf11823_pi14-548_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src84_1.ximg exists
[Thu Oct  6 20:33:01 2011] Fit fullrun_ccd1_acisf11823_pi14-548_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src84 appears to have run properly
[Thu Oct  6 20:33:50 2011] Warning: source 25 in spatial fitting list does not appear to have a counterpart in memory, closest src. was src. 155 at 44.324700 pixels away
[Thu Oct  6 20:33:50 2011] Warning: source 84 in spatial fitting list does not appear to have a counterpart in memory, closest src. was src. 155 at 12.404981 pixels away
[Thu Oct  6 20:33:50 2011] Vigneting correction estimate = 1.000000
[Thu Oct  6 20:33:50 2011] Source flux estimate in the 0.3-8.0 bandpass, Gamma=1.800000 = 0 
[Thu Oct  6 20:33:50 2011] Assessing source extent using major
[Thu Oct  6 20:33:50 2011] Source does appear to be extended
[Thu Oct  6 20:33:50 2011] Computing asymmetry using major and minor axis, asym = 1.18
[Thu Oct  6 20:33:50 2011] Deleting source due to low Poisson probability 0.9