[Thu Oct  6 20:23:11 2011] Detection parameters:
  Position = (379.7, 553.2) = 16 17 20.63 -51 5 46.0
  Extent = 0.5" x 0.5", rotation angle = 33 degrees
  Source counts = 53.3 +/- 13.4
  Background counts = 126.7
  Rate = 0.0009 +/- 0.0002

[Thu Oct  6 20:23:24 2011] Off-axis axis estimate = 5.59'
[Thu Oct  6 20:30:35 2011] Using EEF radius (= 1.44 ")to estimate initial spatial extent for simple fitting
[Thu Oct  6 20:30:35 2011] Initial guess for spatial extent in simple fitting = 1.44"
[Thu Oct  6 20:30:35 2011] source mask rpix=2.9, npix_max = 46, mask sum = 42, frac = 0.899
[Thu Oct  6 20:30:35 2011] Giving source the simple spatial ID 71 for pass 0, mean size = 1.44"
[Thu Oct  6 20:30:39 2011] fullrun_ccd1_acisf11823_pi14-548_cl_pass0_src71.ximg exists
[Thu Oct  6 20:30:39 2011] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_ccd1_acisf11823_pi14-548_cl_pass0_src71.csv
[Thu Oct  6 20:30:39 2011] fullrun_ccd1_acisf11823_pi14-548_cl_pass0_src71_1.ximg exists
[Thu Oct  6 20:30:39 2011] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_ccd1_acisf11823_pi14-548_cl_pass0_src71.csv
[Thu Oct  6 20:30:39 2011] It looks like the fit did not converge
You should probably delete fullrun_ccd1_acisf11823_pi14-548_cl_pass0_src71_1.ximg
Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_ccd1_acisf11823_pi14-548_cl_pass0_src71.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes
[Thu Oct  6 20:30:41 2011] fullrun_ccd1_acisf11823_pi14-548_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src71.ximg exists
[Thu Oct  6 20:30:41 2011] fullrun_ccd1_acisf11823_pi14-548_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src71_1.ximg exists
[Thu Oct  6 20:30:41 2011] Fit fullrun_ccd1_acisf11823_pi14-548_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src71 appears to have run properly
[Thu Oct  6 20:31:45 2011] Warning, spatial fit 71 centroid is now closest to src. 139
[Thu Oct  6 20:31:45 2011] Vigneting correction estimate = 1.000000
[Thu Oct  6 20:31:45 2011] Source flux estimate in the 0.3-8.0 bandpass, Gamma=1.800000 = 0 
[Thu Oct  6 20:31:45 2011] Assessing source extent using major
[Thu Oct  6 20:31:45 2011] Source does appear to be extended
[Thu Oct  6 20:31:45 2011] Computing asymmetry using major and minor axis, asym = 1.00
[Thu Oct  6 20:32:52 2011] Using EEF radius (= 1.44 ")to estimate initial spatial extent for simple fitting
[Thu Oct  6 20:32:52 2011] Initial guess for spatial extent in simple fitting = 1.44"
[Thu Oct  6 20:32:52 2011] source mask rpix=2.9, npix_max = 46, mask sum = 42, frac = 0.899
[Thu Oct  6 20:32:52 2011] Giving source the simple spatial ID 68 for pass 1, mean size = 1.44"
[Thu Oct  6 20:32:55 2011] fullrun_ccd1_acisf11823_pi14-548_cl_pass1_src68.ximg exists
[Thu Oct  6 20:32:55 2011] fullrun_ccd1_acisf11823_pi14-548_cl_pass1_src68_1.ximg exists
[Thu Oct  6 20:32:55 2011] Fit fullrun_ccd1_acisf11823_pi14-548_cl_pass1_src68 appears to have run properly
[Thu Oct  6 20:33:00 2011] fullrun_ccd1_acisf11823_pi14-548_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src68.ximg exists
[Thu Oct  6 20:33:00 2011] fullrun_ccd1_acisf11823_pi14-548_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src68_1.ximg exists
[Thu Oct  6 20:33:00 2011] Fit fullrun_ccd1_acisf11823_pi14-548_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src68 appears to have run properly
[Thu Oct  6 20:33:50 2011] Warning: source 35 in spatial fitting list does not appear to have a counterpart in memory, closest src. was src. 140 at 57.952663 pixels away
[Thu Oct  6 20:33:50 2011] Spatial fit model total counts = 1016.430000, observed total counts = 1014.000000
[Thu Oct  6 20:33:50 2011] Offset between fit and detection position for source 140 = 0.732286 pixels
[Thu Oct  6 20:33:50 2011] 1012.687500 total counts/ 990.237000 bgd. counts: snr = 0.713438
Spatial fit parameters:
  Offset between fit and detection position for source 140 = 0.732286 pixels
  Position = (380.4, 553.4) = 16 17 20.62 -51 5 46.1
  Extent = 0.4" x 0.4", rotation angle = 0
  Source counts = 22.5 +/- 31.8
  Background counts = 990.2
  Rate = 0.0004 +/- 0.0005
  Deleting source due to low Poisson probability