[Fri Sep 23 05:02:28 2011] Detection parameters:
  Position = (520.9, 422.8) = 12 52 11.42 -10 15 16.7
  Extent = 3.3" x 2.9", rotation angle = 68 degrees
  Source counts = 39.7 +/- 13.7
  Background counts = 148.3
  Rate = 0.001 +/- 0.0004

[Fri Sep 23 05:02:29 2011] Off-axis axis estimate = 13.09'
[Fri Sep 23 05:03:51 2011] Using EEF radius (= 7.68 ")to estimate initial spatial extent for simple fitting
[Fri Sep 23 05:03:51 2011] Setting initial spatial extent for simple fitting to maximum allowed for this pass
[Fri Sep 23 05:03:51 2011] Initial guess for spatial extent in simple fitting = 7.68"
[Fri Sep 23 05:03:51 2011] source mask rpix=15.6, npix_max = 1039, mask sum = 1024, frac = 0.985
[Fri Sep 23 05:03:51 2011] Giving source the simple spatial ID 2 for pass 0, mean size = 7.68"
[Fri Sep 23 05:03:52 2011] fullrun_ccd5_acisf11779_pi14-548_cl_pass0_src2.ximg exists
[Fri Sep 23 05:03:52 2011] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_ccd5_acisf11779_pi14-548_cl_pass0_src2.csv
[Fri Sep 23 05:03:52 2011] fullrun_ccd5_acisf11779_pi14-548_cl_pass0_src2_1.ximg exists
[Fri Sep 23 05:03:52 2011] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_ccd5_acisf11779_pi14-548_cl_pass0_src2.csv
[Fri Sep 23 05:03:52 2011] It looks like the fit did not converge
You should probably delete fullrun_ccd5_acisf11779_pi14-548_cl_pass0_src2_1.ximg
Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_ccd5_acisf11779_pi14-548_cl_pass0_src2.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes
[Fri Sep 23 05:03:52 2011] fullrun_ccd5_acisf11779_pi14-548_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src2.ximg exists
[Fri Sep 23 05:03:52 2011] fullrun_ccd5_acisf11779_pi14-548_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src2_1.ximg exists
[Fri Sep 23 05:03:52 2011] Fit fullrun_ccd5_acisf11779_pi14-548_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src2 appears to have run properly
[Fri Sep 23 05:04:01 2011] Warning: source 2 in spatial fitting list does not appear to have a counterpart in memory, closest src. was src. 2 at 26.860711 pixels away
[Fri Sep 23 05:04:01 2011] Vigneting correction estimate = 1.000000
[Fri Sep 23 05:04:01 2011] Source flux estimate in the 0.3-8.0 bandpass, Gamma=1.800000 = 0 
[Fri Sep 23 05:04:01 2011] Assessing source extent using major
[Fri Sep 23 05:04:01 2011] Source does appear to be extended
[Fri Sep 23 05:04:01 2011] Computing asymmetry using major and minor axis, asym = 1.13
[Fri Sep 23 05:04:27 2011] Using EEF radius (= 7.68 ")to estimate initial spatial extent for simple fitting
[Fri Sep 23 05:04:27 2011] Setting initial spatial extent for simple fitting to maximum allowed for this pass
[Fri Sep 23 05:04:27 2011] Initial guess for spatial extent in simple fitting = 7.68"
[Fri Sep 23 05:04:27 2011] source mask rpix=15.6, npix_max = 1039, mask sum = 1024, frac = 0.985
[Fri Sep 23 05:04:27 2011] Giving source the simple spatial ID 2 for pass 1, mean size = 7.68"
[Fri Sep 23 05:04:27 2011] fullrun_ccd5_acisf11779_pi14-548_cl_pass1_src2.ximg exists
[Fri Sep 23 05:04:27 2011] fullrun_ccd5_acisf11779_pi14-548_cl_pass1_src2_1.ximg exists
[Fri Sep 23 05:04:27 2011] Fit fullrun_ccd5_acisf11779_pi14-548_cl_pass1_src2 appears to have run properly
[Fri Sep 23 05:04:27 2011] fullrun_ccd5_acisf11779_pi14-548_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src2.ximg exists
[Fri Sep 23 05:04:27 2011] fullrun_ccd5_acisf11779_pi14-548_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src2_1.ximg exists
[Fri Sep 23 05:04:27 2011] Fit fullrun_ccd5_acisf11779_pi14-548_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src2 appears to have run properly
[Fri Sep 23 05:04:35 2011] Warning: source 2 in spatial fitting list does not appear to have a counterpart in memory, closest src. was src. 2 at 88.431279 pixels away
[Fri Sep 23 05:04:35 2011] Vigneting correction estimate = 1.000000
[Fri Sep 23 05:04:35 2011] Source flux estimate in the 0.3-8.0 bandpass, Gamma=1.800000 = 0 
[Fri Sep 23 05:04:35 2011] Assessing source extent using major
[Fri Sep 23 05:04:35 2011] Source does appear to be extended
[Fri Sep 23 05:04:35 2011] Computing asymmetry using major and minor axis, asym = 1.13
[Fri Sep 23 05:04:35 2011] Deleting source due to low Poisson probability 0.9