[Wed Sep 28 18:14:24 2011] Detection parameters: Position = (859.4, 183.0) = 9 13 11.14 34 56 24.9 Extent = 0.8" x 0.5", rotation angle = 9 degrees Source counts = 18.7 +/- 5.1 Background counts = 7.3 Rate = 0.0006 +/- 0.0002 [Wed Sep 28 18:14:24 2011] Off-axis axis estimate = 11.19' [Wed Sep 28 18:15:09 2011] Using EEF radius (= 5.57 ")to estimate initial spatial extent for simple fitting [Wed Sep 28 18:15:09 2011] Initial guess for spatial extent in simple fitting = 5.57" [Wed Sep 28 18:15:09 2011] source mask rpix=11.3, npix_max = 559, mask sum = 527, frac = 0.941 [Wed Sep 28 18:15:09 2011] Giving source the simple spatial ID 3 for pass 0, mean size = 5.57" [Wed Sep 28 18:15:09 2011] fullrun_ccd3_acisf11777_pi14-548_cl_pass0_src3.ximg exists [Wed Sep 28 18:15:09 2011] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_ccd3_acisf11777_pi14-548_cl_pass0_src3.csv [Wed Sep 28 18:15:09 2011] fullrun_ccd3_acisf11777_pi14-548_cl_pass0_src3_1.ximg exists [Wed Sep 28 18:15:09 2011] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_ccd3_acisf11777_pi14-548_cl_pass0_src3.csv [Wed Sep 28 18:15:09 2011] It looks like the fit did not converge You should probably delete fullrun_ccd3_acisf11777_pi14-548_cl_pass0_src3_1.ximg Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_ccd3_acisf11777_pi14-548_cl_pass0_src3.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes [Wed Sep 28 18:15:09 2011] fullrun_ccd3_acisf11777_pi14-548_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src3.ximg exists [Wed Sep 28 18:15:09 2011] fullrun_ccd3_acisf11777_pi14-548_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src3_1.ximg exists [Wed Sep 28 18:15:09 2011] Fit fullrun_ccd3_acisf11777_pi14-548_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src3 appears to have run properly [Wed Sep 28 18:15:15 2011] Warning: source 3 in spatial fitting list does not appear to have a counterpart in memory, closest src. was src. 3 at 64.132997 pixels away [Wed Sep 28 18:15:15 2011] Vigneting correction estimate = 1.000000 [Wed Sep 28 18:15:15 2011] Source flux estimate in the 0.3-8.0 bandpass, Gamma=1.800000 = 0 [Wed Sep 28 18:15:15 2011] Assessing source extent using major [Wed Sep 28 18:15:15 2011] Source does appear to be extended [Wed Sep 28 18:15:15 2011] Computing asymmetry using major and minor axis, asym = 1.71 [Wed Sep 28 18:15:15 2011] Source is asymmetric [Wed Sep 28 18:15:36 2011] Using EEF radius (= 5.57 ")to estimate initial spatial extent for simple fitting [Wed Sep 28 18:15:36 2011] Initial guess for spatial extent in simple fitting = 5.57" [Wed Sep 28 18:15:36 2011] source mask rpix=11.3, npix_max = 559, mask sum = 527, frac = 0.941 [Wed Sep 28 18:15:36 2011] Giving source the simple spatial ID 3 for pass 1, mean size = 5.57" [Wed Sep 28 18:15:36 2011] fullrun_ccd3_acisf11777_pi14-548_cl_pass1_src3.ximg exists [Wed Sep 28 18:15:36 2011] fullrun_ccd3_acisf11777_pi14-548_cl_pass1_src3_1.ximg exists [Wed Sep 28 18:15:36 2011] Fit fullrun_ccd3_acisf11777_pi14-548_cl_pass1_src3 appears to have run properly [Wed Sep 28 18:15:36 2011] fullrun_ccd3_acisf11777_pi14-548_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src3.ximg exists [Wed Sep 28 18:15:36 2011] fullrun_ccd3_acisf11777_pi14-548_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src3_1.ximg exists [Wed Sep 28 18:15:36 2011] Fit fullrun_ccd3_acisf11777_pi14-548_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src3 appears to have run properly [Wed Sep 28 18:15:43 2011] Warning: source 2 in spatial fitting list does not appear to have a counterpart in memory, closest src. was src. 3 at 580.142971 pixels away [Wed Sep 28 18:15:43 2011] Warning: source 3 in spatial fitting list does not appear to have a counterpart in memory, closest src. was src. 3 at 64.528569 pixels away [Wed Sep 28 18:15:43 2011] Vigneting correction estimate = 1.000000 [Wed Sep 28 18:15:43 2011] Source flux estimate in the 0.3-8.0 bandpass, Gamma=1.800000 = 0 [Wed Sep 28 18:15:43 2011] Assessing source extent using major [Wed Sep 28 18:15:43 2011] Source does appear to be extended [Wed Sep 28 18:15:43 2011] Computing asymmetry using major and minor axis, asym = 1.71 [Wed Sep 28 18:15:43 2011] Source is asymmetric [Wed Sep 28 18:15:43 2011] Deleting source due to low Poisson probability 0.9