[Mon Oct 24 02:41:37 2011] Detection parameters:
  Position = (855.1, 475.0) = 20 9 47.41 -48 21 6.5
  Extent = 0.6" x 0.5", rotation angle = 83 degrees
  Source counts = 10.4 +/- 3.6
  Background counts = 2.6
  Rate = 0.0001 +/- 5e-05

[Mon Oct 24 02:41:39 2011] Off-axis axis estimate = 3.93'
[Mon Oct 24 02:42:48 2011] Using EEF radius (= 0.81 ")to estimate initial spatial extent for simple fitting
[Mon Oct 24 02:42:48 2011] Initial guess for spatial extent in simple fitting = 0.81"
[Mon Oct 24 02:42:48 2011] source mask rpix=1.6, npix_max = 18, mask sum = 16, frac = 0.867
[Mon Oct 24 02:42:48 2011] Giving source the simple spatial ID 42 for pass 0, mean size = 0.81"
[Mon Oct 24 02:42:50 2011] fullrun_ccd3_acisf11753_pi14-548_cl_pass0_src42.ximg exists
[Mon Oct 24 02:42:50 2011] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_ccd3_acisf11753_pi14-548_cl_pass0_src42.csv
[Mon Oct 24 02:42:50 2011] fullrun_ccd3_acisf11753_pi14-548_cl_pass0_src42_1.ximg exists
[Mon Oct 24 02:42:50 2011] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_ccd3_acisf11753_pi14-548_cl_pass0_src42.csv
[Mon Oct 24 02:42:50 2011] It looks like the fit did not converge
You should probably delete fullrun_ccd3_acisf11753_pi14-548_cl_pass0_src42_1.ximg
Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_ccd3_acisf11753_pi14-548_cl_pass0_src42.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes
[Mon Oct 24 02:42:51 2011] fullrun_ccd3_acisf11753_pi14-548_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src42.ximg exists
[Mon Oct 24 02:42:51 2011] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_ccd3_acisf11753_pi14-548_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src42.csv
[Mon Oct 24 02:42:51 2011] fullrun_ccd3_acisf11753_pi14-548_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src42_1.ximg exists
[Mon Oct 24 02:42:51 2011] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_ccd3_acisf11753_pi14-548_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src42.csv
[Mon Oct 24 02:42:51 2011] It looks like the fit did not converge
You should probably delete fullrun_ccd3_acisf11753_pi14-548_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src42_1.ximg
Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_ccd3_acisf11753_pi14-548_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src42.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes
[Mon Oct 24 02:43:10 2011] Spatial fit model total counts = 17.721300, observed total counts = 19.000000
[Mon Oct 24 02:43:10 2011] Offset between fit and detection position for source 25 = 0.569998 pixels
[Mon Oct 24 02:43:10 2011] 17.869890 total counts/ 6.855590 bgd. counts: snr = 4.206632
Spatial fit parameters:
  Offset between fit and detection position for source 25 = 0.569998 pixels
  Position = (855.7, 475.1) = 20 9 47.41 -48 21 6.7
  Extent = 0.6 (0.4-1.0)", rotation angle = 0
  Source counts = 11.0 +/- 4.2
  Background counts = 6.9
  Rate = 0.0002 +/- 6e-05
[Mon Oct 24 02:43:10 2011] Vigneting correction estimate = 1.000000
[Mon Oct 24 02:43:10 2011] Source flux estimate in the 0.3-8.0 bandpass, Gamma=1.800000 = 0 
[Mon Oct 24 02:43:10 2011] Assessing source extent using major axis lower bound
[Mon Oct 24 02:43:10 2011] Source does appear to be extended
[Mon Oct 24 02:43:10 2011] Computing asymmetry using major and minor axis, asym = 1.00
[Mon Oct 24 02:43:10 2011] Deleting source due to low Poisson probability 0.9