[Fri Sep 30 21:23:11 2011] Detection parameters:
  Position = (882.6, 64.4) = 23 18 35.76 0 37 24.7
  Extent = 0.7" x 0.6", rotation angle = 57 degrees
  Source counts = 10.5 +/- 3.7
  Background counts = 3.5
  Rate = 7e-05 +/- 2e-05

[Fri Sep 30 21:23:12 2011] Off-axis axis estimate = 1.27'
[Fri Sep 30 21:24:46 2011] Using EEF radius (= 0.38 ")to estimate initial spatial extent for simple fitting
[Fri Sep 30 21:24:46 2011] Initial guess for spatial extent in simple fitting = 0.38"
[Fri Sep 30 21:24:46 2011] source mask rpix=0.8, npix_max = 6, mask sum = 9, frac = 1.374
[Fri Sep 30 21:24:46 2011] Giving source the simple spatial ID 19 for pass 0, mean size = 0.38"
[Fri Sep 30 21:24:46 2011] fullrun_ccd0_acisf11718_pi14-548_cl_pass0_src19.ximg exists
[Fri Sep 30 21:24:47 2011] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_ccd0_acisf11718_pi14-548_cl_pass0_src19.csv
[Fri Sep 30 21:24:47 2011] fullrun_ccd0_acisf11718_pi14-548_cl_pass0_src19_1.ximg exists
[Fri Sep 30 21:24:47 2011] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_ccd0_acisf11718_pi14-548_cl_pass0_src19.csv
[Fri Sep 30 21:24:47 2011] It looks like the fit did not converge
You should probably delete fullrun_ccd0_acisf11718_pi14-548_cl_pass0_src19_1.ximg
Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_ccd0_acisf11718_pi14-548_cl_pass0_src19.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes
[Fri Sep 30 21:24:47 2011] fullrun_ccd0_acisf11718_pi14-548_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src19.ximg exists
[Fri Sep 30 21:24:47 2011] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_ccd0_acisf11718_pi14-548_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src19.csv
[Fri Sep 30 21:24:47 2011] fullrun_ccd0_acisf11718_pi14-548_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src19_1.ximg exists
[Fri Sep 30 21:24:47 2011] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_ccd0_acisf11718_pi14-548_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src19.csv
[Fri Sep 30 21:24:47 2011] It looks like the fit did not converge
You should probably delete fullrun_ccd0_acisf11718_pi14-548_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src19_1.ximg
Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_ccd0_acisf11718_pi14-548_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src19.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes
[Fri Sep 30 21:25:03 2011] Spatial fit model total counts = 17.559300, observed total counts = 19.000000
[Fri Sep 30 21:25:03 2011] Offset between fit and detection position for source 30 = 0.760161 pixels
[Fri Sep 30 21:25:03 2011] 16.752527 total counts/ 0.675227 bgd. counts: snr = 19.565377
Spatial fit parameters:
  Offset between fit and detection position for source 30 = 0.760161 pixels
  Position = (882.9, 65.0) = 23 18 35.77 0 37 24.8
  Extent = 1.0 (0.3-1.4)", rotation angle = 0
  Source counts = 16.1 +/- 4.1
  Background counts = 0.7
  Rate = 0.0001 +/- 3e-05
[Fri Sep 30 21:25:03 2011] Vigneting correction estimate = 1.000000
[Fri Sep 30 21:25:03 2011] Source flux estimate in the 0.3-8.0 bandpass, Gamma=1.800000 = 0 
[Fri Sep 30 21:25:03 2011] Assessing source extent using major axis lower bound
[Fri Sep 30 21:25:03 2011] Source does appear to be extended
[Fri Sep 30 21:25:03 2011] Computing asymmetry using major and minor axis, asym = 1.00
[Fri Sep 30 21:25:41 2011] Using previous fit value to estimate initial spatial extent for simple fitting
[Fri Sep 30 21:25:41 2011] Initial guess for spatial extent in simple fitting = 0.98"
[Fri Sep 30 21:25:41 2011] source mask rpix=2.0, npix_max = 24, mask sum = 25, frac = 1.006
[Fri Sep 30 21:25:41 2011] Giving source the simple spatial ID 17 for pass 1, mean size = 0.98"
[Fri Sep 30 21:25:42 2011] fullrun_ccd0_acisf11718_pi14-548_cl_pass1_src17.ximg exists
[Fri Sep 30 21:25:42 2011] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_ccd0_acisf11718_pi14-548_cl_pass1_src17.csv
[Fri Sep 30 21:25:42 2011] fullrun_ccd0_acisf11718_pi14-548_cl_pass1_src17_1.ximg exists
[Fri Sep 30 21:25:42 2011] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_ccd0_acisf11718_pi14-548_cl_pass1_src17.csv
[Fri Sep 30 21:25:42 2011] It looks like the fit did not converge
You should probably delete fullrun_ccd0_acisf11718_pi14-548_cl_pass1_src17_1.ximg
Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_ccd0_acisf11718_pi14-548_cl_pass1_src17.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes
[Fri Sep 30 21:25:42 2011] fullrun_ccd0_acisf11718_pi14-548_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src17.ximg exists
[Fri Sep 30 21:25:42 2011] fullrun_ccd0_acisf11718_pi14-548_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src17_1.ximg exists
[Fri Sep 30 21:25:42 2011] Fit fullrun_ccd0_acisf11718_pi14-548_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src17 appears to have run properly
[Fri Sep 30 21:25:55 2011] Spatial fit model total counts = 18.466900, observed total counts = 19.000000
[Fri Sep 30 21:25:55 2011] Offset between fit and detection position for source 30 = 0.916618 pixels
[Fri Sep 30 21:25:55 2011] 17.268670 total counts/ 7.631440 bgd. counts: snr = 3.488582
Spatial fit parameters:
  Offset between fit and detection position for source 30 = 0.916618 pixels
  Position = (883.5, 65.7) = 23 18 35.75 0 37 25.2
  Extent = 0.5 (0.3-1.3)", rotation angle = 0
  Source counts = 9.6 +/- 4.2
  Background counts = 7.6
  Rate = 6e-05 +/- 3e-05
[Fri Sep 30 21:25:55 2011] Vigneting correction estimate = 1.000000
[Fri Sep 30 21:25:55 2011] Source flux estimate in the 0.3-8.0 bandpass, Gamma=1.800000 = 0 
[Fri Sep 30 21:25:55 2011] Assessing source extent using major axis lower bound
[Fri Sep 30 21:25:55 2011] Source does appear to be extended
[Fri Sep 30 21:25:55 2011] Computing asymmetry using major and minor axis, asym = 1.00
[Fri Sep 30 21:25:55 2011] Deleting source due to low Poisson probability 0.9