[Fri Sep 23 15:57:56 2011] Detection parameters:
  Position = (348.1, 1015.5) = 2 54 8.45 41 36 13.4
  Extent = 0.9" x 0.5", rotation angle = 129 degrees
  Source counts = 10.6 +/- 4.0
  Background counts = 5.4
  Rate = 0.0003 +/- 0.0001

[Fri Sep 23 15:57:57 2011] Off-axis axis estimate = 2.90'
[Fri Sep 23 15:59:53 2011] Using EEF radius (= 0.56 ")to estimate initial spatial extent for simple fitting
[Fri Sep 23 15:59:53 2011] Initial guess for spatial extent in simple fitting = 0.56"
[Fri Sep 23 15:59:53 2011] source mask rpix=1.1, npix_max = 10, mask sum = 12, frac = 1.117
[Fri Sep 23 15:59:53 2011] Giving source the simple spatial ID 9 for pass 0, mean size = 0.56"
[Fri Sep 23 15:59:55 2011] fullrun_ccd2_acisf11717_pi14-548_cl_pass0_src9.ximg exists
[Fri Sep 23 15:59:55 2011] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_ccd2_acisf11717_pi14-548_cl_pass0_src9.csv
[Fri Sep 23 15:59:55 2011] fullrun_ccd2_acisf11717_pi14-548_cl_pass0_src9_1.ximg exists
[Fri Sep 23 15:59:55 2011] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_ccd2_acisf11717_pi14-548_cl_pass0_src9.csv
[Fri Sep 23 15:59:55 2011] It looks like the fit did not converge
You should probably delete fullrun_ccd2_acisf11717_pi14-548_cl_pass0_src9_1.ximg
Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_ccd2_acisf11717_pi14-548_cl_pass0_src9.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes
[Fri Sep 23 15:59:55 2011] fullrun_ccd2_acisf11717_pi14-548_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src9.ximg exists
[Fri Sep 23 15:59:55 2011] fullrun_ccd2_acisf11717_pi14-548_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src9_1.ximg exists
[Fri Sep 23 15:59:55 2011] Fit fullrun_ccd2_acisf11717_pi14-548_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src9 appears to have run properly
[Fri Sep 23 16:00:06 2011] Source 4 is offset by -4.452988 and 4.054146 pixels which is larger than
2 X fitted extent = 0.659738 x 0.659738, not incorporating fit results
[Fri Sep 23 16:00:06 2011] Vigneting correction estimate = 1.000000
[Fri Sep 23 16:00:06 2011] Source flux estimate in the 0.3-8.0 bandpass, Gamma=1.800000 = 0 
[Fri Sep 23 16:00:06 2011] Assessing source extent using major
[Fri Sep 23 16:00:06 2011] Source does appear to be extended
[Fri Sep 23 16:00:06 2011] Computing asymmetry using major and minor axis, asym = 1.78
[Fri Sep 23 16:00:06 2011] Source is asymmetric
[Fri Sep 23 16:00:06 2011] Deleting source due to low Poisson probability 0.9