[Wed Oct 26 18:10:25 2011] Detection parameters:
  Position = (138.6, 472.3) = 0 24 46.11 64 9 34.6
  Extent = 0.7" x 0.7", rotation angle = 54 degrees
  Source counts = 197.6 +/- 25.3
  Background counts = 444.4
  Rate = 0.004 +/- 0.0005

[Wed Oct 26 18:10:27 2011] Off-axis axis estimate = 2.31'
[Wed Oct 26 18:25:21 2011] Using EEF radius (= 0.47 ")to estimate initial spatial extent for simple fitting
[Wed Oct 26 18:25:21 2011] Initial guess for spatial extent in simple fitting = 0.47"
[Wed Oct 26 18:25:21 2011] source mask rpix=0.9, npix_max = 8, mask sum = 9, frac = 1.074
[Wed Oct 26 18:25:21 2011] Giving source the simple spatial ID 39 for pass 0, mean size = 0.47"
[Wed Oct 26 18:25:25 2011] fullrun_ccd6_acisf00115_pi14-548_cl_pass0_src39.ximg exists
[Wed Oct 26 18:25:25 2011] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_ccd6_acisf00115_pi14-548_cl_pass0_src39.csv
[Wed Oct 26 18:25:25 2011] fullrun_ccd6_acisf00115_pi14-548_cl_pass0_src39_1.ximg exists
[Wed Oct 26 18:25:25 2011] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_ccd6_acisf00115_pi14-548_cl_pass0_src39.csv
[Wed Oct 26 18:25:25 2011] It looks like the fit did not converge
You should probably delete fullrun_ccd6_acisf00115_pi14-548_cl_pass0_src39_1.ximg
Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_ccd6_acisf00115_pi14-548_cl_pass0_src39.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes
[Wed Oct 26 18:25:27 2011] fullrun_ccd6_acisf00115_pi14-548_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src39.ximg exists
[Wed Oct 26 18:25:27 2011] fullrun_ccd6_acisf00115_pi14-548_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src39_1.ximg exists
[Wed Oct 26 18:25:27 2011] Fit fullrun_ccd6_acisf00115_pi14-548_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src39 appears to have run properly
[Wed Oct 26 18:26:25 2011] Warning, spatial fit 39 centroid is now closest to src. 42
[Wed Oct 26 18:26:25 2011] Vigneting correction estimate = 1.000000
[Wed Oct 26 18:26:25 2011] Source flux estimate in the 0.3-8.0 bandpass, Gamma=1.800000 = 0 
[Wed Oct 26 18:26:25 2011] Assessing source extent using major
[Wed Oct 26 18:26:25 2011] Source does appear to be extended
[Wed Oct 26 18:26:25 2011] Computing asymmetry using major and minor axis, asym = 1.03
[Wed Oct 26 18:26:25 2011] Source is confused with source 42
[Wed Oct 26 18:27:58 2011] Using EEF radius (= 0.47 ")to estimate initial spatial extent for simple fitting
[Wed Oct 26 18:27:58 2011] Initial guess for spatial extent in simple fitting = 0.47"
[Wed Oct 26 18:27:58 2011] source mask rpix=0.9, npix_max = 8, mask sum = 9, frac = 1.074
[Wed Oct 26 18:27:58 2011] Giving source the simple spatial ID 39 for pass 1, mean size = 0.47"
[Wed Oct 26 18:28:01 2011] fullrun_ccd6_acisf00115_pi14-548_cl_pass1_src39.ximg exists
[Wed Oct 26 18:28:01 2011] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_ccd6_acisf00115_pi14-548_cl_pass1_src39.csv
[Wed Oct 26 18:28:01 2011] fullrun_ccd6_acisf00115_pi14-548_cl_pass1_src39_1.ximg exists
[Wed Oct 26 18:28:01 2011] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_ccd6_acisf00115_pi14-548_cl_pass1_src39.csv
[Wed Oct 26 18:28:01 2011] It looks like the fit did not converge
You should probably delete fullrun_ccd6_acisf00115_pi14-548_cl_pass1_src39_1.ximg
Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_ccd6_acisf00115_pi14-548_cl_pass1_src39.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes
[Wed Oct 26 18:28:03 2011] fullrun_ccd6_acisf00115_pi14-548_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src39.ximg exists
[Wed Oct 26 18:28:03 2011] fullrun_ccd6_acisf00115_pi14-548_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src39_1.ximg exists
[Wed Oct 26 18:28:03 2011] Fit fullrun_ccd6_acisf00115_pi14-548_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src39 appears to have run properly
[Wed Oct 26 18:28:48 2011] Warning: source 2 in spatial fitting list does not appear to have a counterpart in memory, closest src. was src. 78 at 44.778428 pixels away
[Wed Oct 26 18:28:48 2011] Warning: source 8 in spatial fitting list does not appear to have a counterpart in memory, closest src. was src. 78 at 23.868739 pixels away
[Wed Oct 26 18:28:48 2011] Source 78 is offset by -7.538356 and 5.177144 pixels which is larger than
2 X fitted extent = 1.670370 x 1.670370, not incorporating fit results
[Wed Oct 26 18:28:48 2011] Spatial fit model total counts = 1919.940000, observed total counts = 1920.000000
[Wed Oct 26 18:28:48 2011] Offset between fit and detection position for source 78 = 1.642039 pixels
[Wed Oct 26 18:28:48 2011] 1735.969400 total counts/ 1671.600000 bgd. counts: snr = 1.574393
Spatial fit parameters:
  Offset between fit and detection position for source 78 = 1.642039 pixels
  Position = (140.0, 473.2) = 0 24 46.04 64 9 34.8
  Extent = 0.7 (0.1-1.5)", rotation angle = 0
  Source counts = 64.4 +/- 41.7
  Background counts = 1671.6
  Rate = 0.001 +/- 0.0009
  Deleting source due to low Poisson probability