[Tue Apr 10 18:33:04 2012] Detection parameters:
  Position = (522.6, 369.8) = 9 55 49.45 69 40 43.2
  Extent = 0.5" x 0.5", rotation angle = 28 degrees
  Source counts = 32.4 +/- 8.6
  Background counts = 41.6
  Rate = 0.003 +/- 0.0009

[Tue Apr 10 18:33:05 2012] Off-axis axis estimate = 0.28'
[Tue Apr 10 18:33:41 2012] Using EEF radius (= 0.41 ")to estimate initial spatial extent for simple fitting
[Tue Apr 10 18:33:41 2012] Initial guess for spatial extent in simple fitting = 0.41"
[Tue Apr 10 18:33:41 2012] source mask rpix=0.8, npix_max = 7, mask sum = 9, frac = 1.281
[Tue Apr 10 18:33:41 2012] Giving source the simple spatial ID 31 for pass 0, mean size = 0.41"
[Tue Apr 10 18:33:43 2012] fullrun_ccd7_acisf11104_pi14-548_cl_pass0_src31.ximg exists
[Tue Apr 10 18:33:43 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_ccd7_acisf11104_pi14-548_cl_pass0_src31.csv
[Tue Apr 10 18:33:43 2012] fullrun_ccd7_acisf11104_pi14-548_cl_pass0_src31_1.ximg exists
[Tue Apr 10 18:33:43 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_ccd7_acisf11104_pi14-548_cl_pass0_src31.csv
[Tue Apr 10 18:33:43 2012] It looks like the fit did not converge
You should probably delete fullrun_ccd7_acisf11104_pi14-548_cl_pass0_src31_1.ximg
Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_ccd7_acisf11104_pi14-548_cl_pass0_src31.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes
[Tue Apr 10 18:33:44 2012] fullrun_ccd7_acisf11104_pi14-548_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src31.ximg exists
[Tue Apr 10 18:33:44 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_ccd7_acisf11104_pi14-548_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src31.csv
[Tue Apr 10 18:33:44 2012] fullrun_ccd7_acisf11104_pi14-548_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src31_1.ximg exists
[Tue Apr 10 18:33:44 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_ccd7_acisf11104_pi14-548_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src31.csv
[Tue Apr 10 18:33:44 2012] It looks like the fit did not converge
You should probably delete fullrun_ccd7_acisf11104_pi14-548_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src31_1.ximg
Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_ccd7_acisf11104_pi14-548_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src31.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes
[Tue Apr 10 18:33:53 2012] Spatial fit model total counts = 310.610000, observed total counts = 1961.000000
[Tue Apr 10 18:33:53 2012] Poor agreement between spatial fit and data for source 26
It may help to tweak spatial fit manually
Not incorporating fit results
[Tue Apr 10 18:33:53 2012] Vigneting correction estimate = 1.000000
[Tue Apr 10 18:33:53 2012] Source flux estimate in the 0.3-8.0 bandpass, Gamma=1.800000 = 0 
[Tue Apr 10 18:33:53 2012] Assessing source extent using major
[Tue Apr 10 18:33:53 2012] Source does appear to be extended
[Tue Apr 10 18:33:53 2012] Computing asymmetry using major and minor axis, asym = 1.00
[Tue Apr 10 18:34:05 2012] Using EEF radius (= 0.41 ")to estimate initial spatial extent for simple fitting
[Tue Apr 10 18:34:05 2012] Initial guess for spatial extent in simple fitting = 0.41"
[Tue Apr 10 18:34:05 2012] source mask rpix=0.8, npix_max = 7, mask sum = 9, frac = 1.281
[Tue Apr 10 18:34:05 2012] Giving source the simple spatial ID 31 for pass 1, mean size = 0.41"
[Tue Apr 10 18:34:06 2012] fullrun_ccd7_acisf11104_pi14-548_cl_pass1_src31.ximg exists
[Tue Apr 10 18:34:06 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_ccd7_acisf11104_pi14-548_cl_pass1_src31.csv
[Tue Apr 10 18:34:06 2012] fullrun_ccd7_acisf11104_pi14-548_cl_pass1_src31_1.ximg exists
[Tue Apr 10 18:34:06 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_ccd7_acisf11104_pi14-548_cl_pass1_src31.csv
[Tue Apr 10 18:34:06 2012] It looks like the fit did not converge
You should probably delete fullrun_ccd7_acisf11104_pi14-548_cl_pass1_src31_1.ximg
Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_ccd7_acisf11104_pi14-548_cl_pass1_src31.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes
[Tue Apr 10 18:34:07 2012] fullrun_ccd7_acisf11104_pi14-548_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src31.ximg exists
[Tue Apr 10 18:34:07 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_ccd7_acisf11104_pi14-548_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src31.csv
[Tue Apr 10 18:34:07 2012] fullrun_ccd7_acisf11104_pi14-548_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src31_1.ximg exists
[Tue Apr 10 18:34:07 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_ccd7_acisf11104_pi14-548_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src31.csv
[Tue Apr 10 18:34:07 2012] It looks like the fit did not converge
You should probably delete fullrun_ccd7_acisf11104_pi14-548_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src31_1.ximg
Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_ccd7_acisf11104_pi14-548_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src31.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes
[Tue Apr 10 18:34:17 2012] Warning: source 13 in spatial fitting list does not appear to have a counterpart in memory, closest src. was src. 26 at 14.089767 pixels away
[Tue Apr 10 18:34:17 2012] Source 26 is offset by 2.888460 and -4.476595 pixels which is larger than
2 X fitted extent = 0.412541 x 0.412541, not incorporating fit results
[Tue Apr 10 18:34:17 2012] Vigneting correction estimate = 1.000000
[Tue Apr 10 18:34:17 2012] Source flux estimate in the 0.3-8.0 bandpass, Gamma=1.800000 = 0 
[Tue Apr 10 18:34:17 2012] Assessing source extent using major
[Tue Apr 10 18:34:17 2012] Source does appear to be extended
[Tue Apr 10 18:34:17 2012] Computing asymmetry using major and minor axis, asym = 1.00
[Tue Apr 10 18:34:17 2012] Deleting source due to low Poisson probability 0.9