[Sun Oct 23 04:49:38 2011] Detection parameters:
  Position = (642.6, 158.8) = 20 32 40.44 41 14 35.2
  Extent = 1.9" x 0.5", rotation angle = 45 degrees
  Source counts = 30.5 +/- 7.1
  Background counts = 20.5
  Rate = 0.001 +/- 0.0002

[Sun Oct 23 04:49:39 2011] Off-axis axis estimate = 11.43'
[Sun Oct 23 04:51:58 2011] Using EEF radius (= 5.82 ")to estimate initial spatial extent for simple fitting
[Sun Oct 23 04:51:58 2011] Initial guess for spatial extent in simple fitting = 5.82"
[Sun Oct 23 04:51:58 2011] source mask rpix=11.8, npix_max = 608, mask sum = 491, frac = 0.807
[Sun Oct 23 04:51:58 2011] Giving source the simple spatial ID 2 for pass 0, mean size = 5.82"
[Sun Oct 23 04:51:59 2011] fullrun_ccd6_acisf10964_pi14-548_cl_pass0_src2.ximg exists
[Sun Oct 23 04:51:59 2011] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_ccd6_acisf10964_pi14-548_cl_pass0_src2.csv
[Sun Oct 23 04:51:59 2011] fullrun_ccd6_acisf10964_pi14-548_cl_pass0_src2_1.ximg exists
[Sun Oct 23 04:51:59 2011] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_ccd6_acisf10964_pi14-548_cl_pass0_src2.csv
[Sun Oct 23 04:51:59 2011] It looks like the fit did not converge
You should probably delete fullrun_ccd6_acisf10964_pi14-548_cl_pass0_src2_1.ximg
Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_ccd6_acisf10964_pi14-548_cl_pass0_src2.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes
[Sun Oct 23 04:51:59 2011] fullrun_ccd6_acisf10964_pi14-548_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src2.ximg exists
[Sun Oct 23 04:51:59 2011] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_ccd6_acisf10964_pi14-548_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src2.csv
[Sun Oct 23 04:51:59 2011] fullrun_ccd6_acisf10964_pi14-548_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src2_1.ximg exists
[Sun Oct 23 04:51:59 2011] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_ccd6_acisf10964_pi14-548_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src2.csv
[Sun Oct 23 04:51:59 2011] It looks like the fit did not converge
You should probably delete fullrun_ccd6_acisf10964_pi14-548_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src2_1.ximg
Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_ccd6_acisf10964_pi14-548_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src2.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes
[Sun Oct 23 04:52:33 2011] Warning, spatial fit 2 centroid is now closest to src. 6
[Sun Oct 23 04:52:33 2011] Vigneting correction estimate = 1.000000
[Sun Oct 23 04:52:33 2011] Source flux estimate in the 0.3-8.0 bandpass, Gamma=1.800000 = 0 
[Sun Oct 23 04:52:33 2011] Assessing source extent using major
[Sun Oct 23 04:52:33 2011] Source does appear to be extended
[Sun Oct 23 04:52:33 2011] Computing asymmetry using major and minor axis, asym = 3.96
[Sun Oct 23 04:52:33 2011] Source is asymmetric
[Sun Oct 23 04:52:33 2011] Source is confused with source 9
[Sun Oct 23 04:53:13 2011] Using EEF radius (= 5.82 ")to estimate initial spatial extent for simple fitting
[Sun Oct 23 04:53:13 2011] Initial guess for spatial extent in simple fitting = 5.82"
[Sun Oct 23 04:53:13 2011] source mask rpix=11.8, npix_max = 608, mask sum = 491, frac = 0.807
[Sun Oct 23 04:53:13 2011] Giving source the simple spatial ID 2 for pass 1, mean size = 5.82"
[Sun Oct 23 04:53:13 2011] fullrun_ccd6_acisf10964_pi14-548_cl_pass1_src2.ximg exists
[Sun Oct 23 04:53:13 2011] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_ccd6_acisf10964_pi14-548_cl_pass1_src2.csv
[Sun Oct 23 04:53:13 2011] fullrun_ccd6_acisf10964_pi14-548_cl_pass1_src2_1.ximg exists
[Sun Oct 23 04:53:13 2011] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_ccd6_acisf10964_pi14-548_cl_pass1_src2.csv
[Sun Oct 23 04:53:13 2011] It looks like the fit did not converge
You should probably delete fullrun_ccd6_acisf10964_pi14-548_cl_pass1_src2_1.ximg
Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_ccd6_acisf10964_pi14-548_cl_pass1_src2.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes
[Sun Oct 23 04:53:13 2011] fullrun_ccd6_acisf10964_pi14-548_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src2.ximg exists
[Sun Oct 23 04:53:13 2011] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_ccd6_acisf10964_pi14-548_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src2.csv
[Sun Oct 23 04:53:13 2011] fullrun_ccd6_acisf10964_pi14-548_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src2_1.ximg exists
[Sun Oct 23 04:53:13 2011] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_ccd6_acisf10964_pi14-548_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src2.csv
[Sun Oct 23 04:53:13 2011] It looks like the fit did not converge
You should probably delete fullrun_ccd6_acisf10964_pi14-548_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src2_1.ximg
Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_ccd6_acisf10964_pi14-548_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src2.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes
[Sun Oct 23 04:53:42 2011] Warning: source 2 in spatial fitting list does not appear to have a counterpart in memory, closest src. was src. 8 at 64.800844 pixels away
[Sun Oct 23 04:53:42 2011] Warning: source 3 in spatial fitting list does not appear to have a counterpart in memory, closest src. was src. 8 at 58.756457 pixels away
[Sun Oct 23 04:53:42 2011] Vigneting correction estimate = 1.000000
[Sun Oct 23 04:53:42 2011] Source flux estimate in the 0.3-8.0 bandpass, Gamma=1.800000 = 0 
[Sun Oct 23 04:53:42 2011] Assessing source extent using major
[Sun Oct 23 04:53:42 2011] Source does appear to be extended
[Sun Oct 23 04:53:42 2011] Computing asymmetry using major and minor axis, asym = 3.96
[Sun Oct 23 04:53:42 2011] Source is asymmetric
[Sun Oct 23 04:53:42 2011] Deleting source due to low Poisson probability 0.9