[Sun Oct 23 04:49:28 2011] Detection parameters:
  Position = (366.1, 1089.2) = 20 32 53.26 41 0 9.5
  Extent = 0.9" x 0.7", rotation angle = 104 degrees
  Source counts = 82.8 +/- 9.9
  Background counts = 16.2
  Rate = 0.003 +/- 0.0003

[Sun Oct 23 04:49:29 2011] Off-axis axis estimate = 3.33'
[Sun Oct 23 04:51:42 2011] Using EEF radius (= 0.65 ")to estimate initial spatial extent for simple fitting
[Sun Oct 23 04:51:42 2011] Initial guess for spatial extent in simple fitting = 0.65"
[Sun Oct 23 04:51:42 2011] source mask rpix=1.3, npix_max = 13, mask sum = 16, frac = 1.203
[Sun Oct 23 04:51:42 2011] Giving source the simple spatial ID 51 for pass 0, mean size = 0.65"
[Sun Oct 23 04:51:45 2011] fullrun_ccd1_acisf10964_pi14-548_cl_pass0_src51.ximg exists
[Sun Oct 23 04:51:45 2011] fullrun_ccd1_acisf10964_pi14-548_cl_pass0_src51_1.ximg exists
[Sun Oct 23 04:51:45 2011] Fit fullrun_ccd1_acisf10964_pi14-548_cl_pass0_src51 appears to have run properly
[Sun Oct 23 04:51:48 2011] fullrun_ccd1_acisf10964_pi14-548_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src51.ximg exists
[Sun Oct 23 04:51:48 2011] fullrun_ccd1_acisf10964_pi14-548_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src51_1.ximg exists
[Sun Oct 23 04:51:48 2011] Fit fullrun_ccd1_acisf10964_pi14-548_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src51 appears to have run properly
[Sun Oct 23 04:52:22 2011] Source 97 is offset by 3.615361 and -3.270794 pixels which is larger than
2 X fitted extent = 6.626829 x 2.037950, not incorporating fit results
[Sun Oct 23 04:52:22 2011] Vigneting correction estimate = 1.000000
[Sun Oct 23 04:52:22 2011] Source flux estimate in the 0.3-8.0 bandpass, Gamma=1.800000 = 0 
[Sun Oct 23 04:52:22 2011] Assessing source extent using major
[Sun Oct 23 04:52:22 2011] Source does appear to be extended
[Sun Oct 23 04:52:22 2011] Computing asymmetry using major and minor axis, asym = 1.26
[Sun Oct 23 04:52:22 2011] Source is confused with source 96
[Sun Oct 23 04:53:02 2011] Using EEF radius (= 0.65 ")to estimate initial spatial extent for simple fitting
[Sun Oct 23 04:53:02 2011] Initial guess for spatial extent in simple fitting = 0.65"
[Sun Oct 23 04:53:02 2011] source mask rpix=1.3, npix_max = 13, mask sum = 16, frac = 1.203
[Sun Oct 23 04:53:02 2011] Giving source the simple spatial ID 49 for pass 1, mean size = 0.65"
[Sun Oct 23 04:53:05 2011] fullrun_ccd1_acisf10964_pi14-548_cl_pass1_src49.ximg exists
[Sun Oct 23 04:53:05 2011] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_ccd1_acisf10964_pi14-548_cl_pass1_src49.csv
[Sun Oct 23 04:53:05 2011] fullrun_ccd1_acisf10964_pi14-548_cl_pass1_src49_1.ximg exists
[Sun Oct 23 04:53:05 2011] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_ccd1_acisf10964_pi14-548_cl_pass1_src49.csv
[Sun Oct 23 04:53:05 2011] It looks like the fit did not converge
You should probably delete fullrun_ccd1_acisf10964_pi14-548_cl_pass1_src49_1.ximg
Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_ccd1_acisf10964_pi14-548_cl_pass1_src49.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes
[Sun Oct 23 04:53:08 2011] fullrun_ccd1_acisf10964_pi14-548_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src49.ximg exists
[Sun Oct 23 04:53:08 2011] fullrun_ccd1_acisf10964_pi14-548_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src49_1.ximg exists
[Sun Oct 23 04:53:08 2011] Fit fullrun_ccd1_acisf10964_pi14-548_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src49 appears to have run properly
[Sun Oct 23 04:53:33 2011] Warning, spatial fit 49 centroid is now closest to src. 96
[Sun Oct 23 04:53:33 2011] Warning: source 55 in spatial fitting list does not appear to have a counterpart in memory, closest src. was src. 97 at 17.184111 pixels away
[Sun Oct 23 04:53:33 2011] Vigneting correction estimate = 1.000000
[Sun Oct 23 04:53:33 2011] Source flux estimate in the 0.3-8.0 bandpass, Gamma=1.800000 = 0 
[Sun Oct 23 04:53:33 2011] Assessing source extent using major
[Sun Oct 23 04:53:33 2011] Source does appear to be extended
[Sun Oct 23 04:53:33 2011] Computing asymmetry using major and minor axis, asym = 1.26
[Sun Oct 23 04:53:33 2011] Deleting source due to low Poisson probability 0.9