[Sun Oct 23 04:49:26 2011] Detection parameters: Position = (528.4, 1013.6) = 20 32 46.20 40 59 32.3 Extent = 0.5" x 0.5", rotation angle = 111 degrees Source counts = 22.5 +/- 5.6 Background counts = 8.5 Rate = 0.0008 +/- 0.0002 [Sun Oct 23 04:49:29 2011] Off-axis axis estimate = 3.67' [Sun Oct 23 04:51:42 2011] Using EEF radius (= 0.74 ")to estimate initial spatial extent for simple fitting [Sun Oct 23 04:51:42 2011] Initial guess for spatial extent in simple fitting = 0.74" [Sun Oct 23 04:51:42 2011] source mask rpix=1.5, npix_max = 15, mask sum = 12, frac = 0.753 [Sun Oct 23 04:51:42 2011] Giving source the simple spatial ID 71 for pass 0, mean size = 0.74" [Sun Oct 23 04:51:46 2011] fullrun_ccd1_acisf10964_pi14-548_cl_pass0_src71.ximg exists [Sun Oct 23 04:51:46 2011] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_ccd1_acisf10964_pi14-548_cl_pass0_src71.csv [Sun Oct 23 04:51:46 2011] fullrun_ccd1_acisf10964_pi14-548_cl_pass0_src71_1.ximg exists [Sun Oct 23 04:51:46 2011] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_ccd1_acisf10964_pi14-548_cl_pass0_src71.csv [Sun Oct 23 04:51:46 2011] It looks like the fit did not converge You should probably delete fullrun_ccd1_acisf10964_pi14-548_cl_pass0_src71_1.ximg Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_ccd1_acisf10964_pi14-548_cl_pass0_src71.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes [Sun Oct 23 04:51:49 2011] fullrun_ccd1_acisf10964_pi14-548_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src71.ximg exists [Sun Oct 23 04:51:49 2011] fullrun_ccd1_acisf10964_pi14-548_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src71_1.ximg exists [Sun Oct 23 04:51:49 2011] Fit fullrun_ccd1_acisf10964_pi14-548_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src71 appears to have run properly [Sun Oct 23 04:52:22 2011] Warning: source 34 in spatial fitting list does not appear to have a counterpart in memory, closest src. was src. 85 at 11.460918 pixels away [Sun Oct 23 04:52:22 2011] Source 85 is offset by -4.869826 and -6.929849 pixels which is larger than 2 X fitted extent = 2.135719 x 2.135719, not incorporating fit results [Sun Oct 23 04:52:22 2011] Vigneting correction estimate = 1.000000 [Sun Oct 23 04:52:22 2011] Source flux estimate in the 0.3-8.0 bandpass, Gamma=1.800000 = 0 [Sun Oct 23 04:52:22 2011] Assessing source extent using major [Sun Oct 23 04:52:22 2011] Source does appear to be extended [Sun Oct 23 04:52:22 2011] Computing asymmetry using major and minor axis, asym = 1.00 [Sun Oct 23 04:52:22 2011] Deleting source due to low Poisson probability 0.7