[Tue Oct 25 17:56:26 2011] Detection parameters:
  Position = (582.2, 659.0) = 20 34 1.73 41 40 9.8
  Extent = 1.5" x 1.3", rotation angle = 128 degrees
  Source counts = 10.5 +/- 3.7
  Background counts = 3.5
  Rate = 0.0004 +/- 0.0001

[Tue Oct 25 17:56:27 2011] Off-axis axis estimate = 6.02'
[Tue Oct 25 17:57:27 2011] Using EEF radius (= 1.64 ")to estimate initial spatial extent for simple fitting
[Tue Oct 25 17:57:27 2011] Initial guess for spatial extent in simple fitting = 1.64"
[Tue Oct 25 17:57:27 2011] source mask rpix=3.3, npix_max = 58, mask sum = 64, frac = 1.088
[Tue Oct 25 17:57:27 2011] Giving source the simple spatial ID 9 for pass 0, mean size = 1.64"
[Tue Oct 25 17:57:29 2011] fullrun_ccd2_acisf10949_pi14-548_cl_pass0_src9.ximg exists
[Tue Oct 25 17:57:29 2011] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_ccd2_acisf10949_pi14-548_cl_pass0_src9.csv
[Tue Oct 25 17:57:29 2011] fullrun_ccd2_acisf10949_pi14-548_cl_pass0_src9_1.ximg exists
[Tue Oct 25 17:57:29 2011] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_ccd2_acisf10949_pi14-548_cl_pass0_src9.csv
[Tue Oct 25 17:57:29 2011] It looks like the fit did not converge
You should probably delete fullrun_ccd2_acisf10949_pi14-548_cl_pass0_src9_1.ximg
Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_ccd2_acisf10949_pi14-548_cl_pass0_src9.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes
[Tue Oct 25 17:57:29 2011] fullrun_ccd2_acisf10949_pi14-548_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src9.ximg exists
[Tue Oct 25 17:57:29 2011] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_ccd2_acisf10949_pi14-548_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src9.csv
[Tue Oct 25 17:57:29 2011] fullrun_ccd2_acisf10949_pi14-548_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src9_1.ximg exists
[Tue Oct 25 17:57:29 2011] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_ccd2_acisf10949_pi14-548_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src9.csv
[Tue Oct 25 17:57:29 2011] It looks like the fit did not converge
You should probably delete fullrun_ccd2_acisf10949_pi14-548_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src9_1.ximg
Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_ccd2_acisf10949_pi14-548_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src9.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes
[Tue Oct 25 17:57:48 2011] Spatial fit model total counts = 16.764800, observed total counts = 18.000000
[Tue Oct 25 17:57:48 2011] Offset between fit and detection position for source 11 = 1.987008 pixels
[Tue Oct 25 17:57:48 2011] 16.701020 total counts/ 10.623000 bgd. counts: snr = 1.864827
Spatial fit parameters:
  Offset between fit and detection position for source 11 = 1.987008 pixels
  Position = (581.4, 660.8) = 20 34 1.78 41 40 10.5
  Extent = 0.7 (0.4-1.0)", rotation angle = 0
  Source counts = 6.1 +/- 4.1
  Background counts = 10.6
  Rate = 0.0002 +/- 0.0001
[Tue Oct 25 17:57:48 2011] Vigneting correction estimate = 1.000000
[Tue Oct 25 17:57:48 2011] Source flux estimate in the 0.3-8.0 bandpass, Gamma=1.800000 = 0 
[Tue Oct 25 17:57:48 2011] Assessing source extent using major axis lower bound
[Tue Oct 25 17:57:48 2011] Source does appear to be extended
[Tue Oct 25 17:57:48 2011] Computing asymmetry using major and minor axis, asym = 1.00
[Tue Oct 25 17:58:17 2011] Using previous fit value to estimate initial spatial extent for simple fitting
[Tue Oct 25 17:58:17 2011] Initial guess for spatial extent in simple fitting = 0.70"
[Tue Oct 25 17:58:17 2011] Spatial fitting skipped for pass 1: source                                 has 6.1 net counts, is at off-axis angle 6.0'
[Tue Oct 25 17:58:33 2011] Vigneting correction estimate = 1.000000
[Tue Oct 25 17:58:33 2011] Source flux estimate in the 0.3-8.0 bandpass, Gamma=1.800000 = 0 
[Tue Oct 25 17:58:33 2011] Assessing source extent using major axis lower bound
[Tue Oct 25 17:58:33 2011] Source does appear to be extended
[Tue Oct 25 17:58:33 2011] Computing asymmetry using major and minor axis, asym = 1.00
[Tue Oct 25 17:58:33 2011] Deleting source due to low Poisson probability 0.9