[Tue Apr 10 21:36:21 2012] Detection parameters:
  Position = (507.7, 1080.2) = 9 56 1.82 69 43 8.8
  Extent = 1.1" x 0.7", rotation angle = 17 degrees
  Source counts = 50.3 +/- 7.9
  Background counts = 11.7
  Rate = 0.001 +/- 0.0002

[Tue Apr 10 21:36:24 2012] Off-axis axis estimate = 4.80'
[Tue Apr 10 21:37:28 2012] Using EEF radius (= 1.10 ")to estimate initial spatial extent for simple fitting
[Tue Apr 10 21:37:28 2012] Initial guess for spatial extent in simple fitting = 1.10"
[Tue Apr 10 21:37:28 2012] source mask rpix=2.2, npix_max = 29, mask sum = 30, frac = 1.000
[Tue Apr 10 21:37:28 2012] Giving source the simple spatial ID 51 for pass 0, mean size = 1.10"
[Tue Apr 10 21:37:30 2012] fullrun_ccd7_acisf10925_pi14-548_cl_pass0_src51.ximg exists
[Tue Apr 10 21:37:30 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_ccd7_acisf10925_pi14-548_cl_pass0_src51.csv
[Tue Apr 10 21:37:30 2012] fullrun_ccd7_acisf10925_pi14-548_cl_pass0_src51_1.ximg exists
[Tue Apr 10 21:37:30 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_ccd7_acisf10925_pi14-548_cl_pass0_src51.csv
[Tue Apr 10 21:37:30 2012] It looks like the fit did not converge
You should probably delete fullrun_ccd7_acisf10925_pi14-548_cl_pass0_src51_1.ximg
Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_ccd7_acisf10925_pi14-548_cl_pass0_src51.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes
[Tue Apr 10 21:37:32 2012] fullrun_ccd7_acisf10925_pi14-548_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src51.ximg exists
[Tue Apr 10 21:37:32 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_ccd7_acisf10925_pi14-548_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src51.csv
[Tue Apr 10 21:37:32 2012] fullrun_ccd7_acisf10925_pi14-548_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src51_1.ximg exists
[Tue Apr 10 21:37:32 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_ccd7_acisf10925_pi14-548_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src51.csv
[Tue Apr 10 21:37:32 2012] It looks like the fit did not converge
You should probably delete fullrun_ccd7_acisf10925_pi14-548_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src51_1.ximg
Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_ccd7_acisf10925_pi14-548_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src51.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes
[Tue Apr 10 21:37:48 2012] Spatial fit model total counts = 60.303300, observed total counts = 78.000000
[Tue Apr 10 21:37:48 2012] Poor agreement between spatial fit and data for source 56
It may help to tweak spatial fit manually
Not incorporating fit results
[Tue Apr 10 21:37:48 2012] Vigneting correction estimate = 1.000000
[Tue Apr 10 21:37:48 2012] Source flux estimate in the 0.3-8.0 bandpass, Gamma=1.800000 = 0 
[Tue Apr 10 21:37:48 2012] Assessing source extent using major
[Tue Apr 10 21:37:48 2012] Source does appear to be extended
[Tue Apr 10 21:37:48 2012] Computing asymmetry using major and minor axis, asym = 1.50
[Tue Apr 10 21:37:48 2012] Source is asymmetric
[Tue Apr 10 21:38:08 2012] Using EEF radius (= 1.10 ")to estimate initial spatial extent for simple fitting
[Tue Apr 10 21:38:08 2012] Initial guess for spatial extent in simple fitting = 1.10"
[Tue Apr 10 21:38:08 2012] source mask rpix=2.2, npix_max = 29, mask sum = 30, frac = 1.000
[Tue Apr 10 21:38:08 2012] Giving source the simple spatial ID 49 for pass 1, mean size = 1.10"
[Tue Apr 10 21:38:11 2012] fullrun_ccd7_acisf10925_pi14-548_cl_pass1_src49.ximg exists
[Tue Apr 10 21:38:11 2012] fullrun_ccd7_acisf10925_pi14-548_cl_pass1_src49_1.ximg exists
[Tue Apr 10 21:38:11 2012] Fit fullrun_ccd7_acisf10925_pi14-548_cl_pass1_src49 appears to have run properly
[Tue Apr 10 21:38:15 2012] fullrun_ccd7_acisf10925_pi14-548_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src49.ximg exists
[Tue Apr 10 21:38:15 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_ccd7_acisf10925_pi14-548_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src49.csv
[Tue Apr 10 21:38:15 2012] fullrun_ccd7_acisf10925_pi14-548_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src49_1.ximg exists
[Tue Apr 10 21:38:15 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_ccd7_acisf10925_pi14-548_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src49.csv
[Tue Apr 10 21:38:15 2012] It looks like the fit did not converge
You should probably delete fullrun_ccd7_acisf10925_pi14-548_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src49_1.ximg
Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_ccd7_acisf10925_pi14-548_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src49.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes
[Tue Apr 10 21:38:26 2012] Spatial fit model total counts = 75.433300, observed total counts = 78.000000
[Tue Apr 10 21:38:26 2012] Offset between fit and detection position for source 56 = 6.664148 pixels
[Tue Apr 10 21:38:26 2012] 31.353213 total counts/ 30.371100 bgd. counts: snr = 0.178210
Spatial fit parameters:
  Offset between fit and detection position for source 56 = 6.664148 pixels
  Position = (503.1, 1084.9) = 9 56 2.31 69 43 10.9
  Extent = 1.5" x 1.5", rotation angle = 0
  Source counts = 1.0 +/- 5.6
  Background counts = 30.4
  Rate = 2e-05 +/- 0.0001
  Deleting source due to low Poisson probability