[Wed Sep 28 06:23:12 2011] Detection parameters:
  Position = (432.2, 75.1) = 7 41 45.08 74 11 19.1
  Extent = 0.5" x 0.5", rotation angle = 61 degrees
  Source counts = 11.2 +/- 3.5
  Background counts = 0.8
  Rate = 0.0003 +/- 0.0001

[Wed Sep 28 06:23:12 2011] Off-axis axis estimate = 2.92'
[Wed Sep 28 06:24:10 2011] Using EEF radius (= 0.56 ")to estimate initial spatial extent for simple fitting
[Wed Sep 28 06:24:10 2011] Initial guess for spatial extent in simple fitting = 0.56"
[Wed Sep 28 06:24:10 2011] source mask rpix=1.1, npix_max = 10, mask sum = 12, frac = 1.106
[Wed Sep 28 06:24:10 2011] Giving source the simple spatial ID 12 for pass 0, mean size = 0.56"
[Wed Sep 28 06:24:10 2011] fullrun_ccd3_acisf10922_pi14-548_cl_pass0_src12.ximg exists
[Wed Sep 28 06:24:10 2011] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_ccd3_acisf10922_pi14-548_cl_pass0_src12.csv
[Wed Sep 28 06:24:10 2011] fullrun_ccd3_acisf10922_pi14-548_cl_pass0_src12_1.ximg exists
[Wed Sep 28 06:24:10 2011] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_ccd3_acisf10922_pi14-548_cl_pass0_src12.csv
[Wed Sep 28 06:24:10 2011] It looks like the fit did not converge
You should probably delete fullrun_ccd3_acisf10922_pi14-548_cl_pass0_src12_1.ximg
Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_ccd3_acisf10922_pi14-548_cl_pass0_src12.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes
[Wed Sep 28 06:24:11 2011] fullrun_ccd3_acisf10922_pi14-548_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src12.ximg exists
[Wed Sep 28 06:24:11 2011] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_ccd3_acisf10922_pi14-548_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src12.csv
[Wed Sep 28 06:24:11 2011] fullrun_ccd3_acisf10922_pi14-548_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src12_1.ximg exists
[Wed Sep 28 06:24:11 2011] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_ccd3_acisf10922_pi14-548_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src12.csv
[Wed Sep 28 06:24:11 2011] It looks like the fit did not converge
You should probably delete fullrun_ccd3_acisf10922_pi14-548_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src12_1.ximg
Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_ccd3_acisf10922_pi14-548_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src12.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes
[Wed Sep 28 06:24:17 2011] Spatial fit model total counts = 12.808400, observed total counts = 15.000000
[Wed Sep 28 06:24:17 2011] Offset between fit and detection position for source 14 = 1.019227 pixels
[Wed Sep 28 06:24:17 2011] 12.947280 total counts/ 2.200980 bgd. counts: snr = 7.243541
Spatial fit parameters:
  Offset between fit and detection position for source 14 = 1.019227 pixels
  Position = (432.8, 75.9) = 7 41 45.07 74 11 19.3
  Extent = 0.5" x 0.3", rotation angle = 356
  Source counts = 10.7 +/- 3.6
  Background counts = 2.2
  Rate = 0.0003 +/- 0.0001
[Wed Sep 28 06:24:17 2011] Vigneting correction estimate = 1.000000
[Wed Sep 28 06:24:17 2011] Source flux estimate in the 0.3-8.0 bandpass, Gamma=1.800000 = 0 
[Wed Sep 28 06:24:17 2011] Assessing source extent using major
[Wed Sep 28 06:24:17 2011] Source does appear to be extended
[Wed Sep 28 06:24:17 2011] Computing asymmetry using major and minor axis, asym = 1.93
[Wed Sep 28 06:24:17 2011] Source is asymmetric
[Wed Sep 28 06:24:17 2011] Deleting source due to low Poisson probability 0.9