[Fri Oct 7 12:51:07 2011] Detection parameters: Position = (1021.7, 798.5) = 0 25 57.95 64 7 49.6 Extent = 0.5" x 0.5", rotation angle = 71 degrees Source counts = 225.9 +/- 19.5 Background counts = 156.1 Rate = 0.005 +/- 0.0005 [Fri Oct 7 12:51:18 2011] Off-axis axis estimate = 4.04' [Fri Oct 7 13:00:52 2011] Using EEF radius (= 0.84 ")to estimate initial spatial extent for simple fitting [Fri Oct 7 13:00:52 2011] Initial guess for spatial extent in simple fitting = 0.84" [Fri Oct 7 13:00:52 2011] source mask rpix=1.7, npix_max = 19, mask sum = 20, frac = 1.023 [Fri Oct 7 13:00:52 2011] Giving source the simple spatial ID 53 for pass 0, mean size = 0.84" [Fri Oct 7 13:00:57 2011] fullrun_ccd0_acisf10906_pi14-548_cl_pass0_src53.ximg exists [Fri Oct 7 13:00:57 2011] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_ccd0_acisf10906_pi14-548_cl_pass0_src53.csv [Fri Oct 7 13:00:57 2011] fullrun_ccd0_acisf10906_pi14-548_cl_pass0_src53_1.ximg exists [Fri Oct 7 13:00:57 2011] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_ccd0_acisf10906_pi14-548_cl_pass0_src53.csv [Fri Oct 7 13:00:57 2011] It looks like the fit did not converge You should probably delete fullrun_ccd0_acisf10906_pi14-548_cl_pass0_src53_1.ximg Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_ccd0_acisf10906_pi14-548_cl_pass0_src53.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes [Fri Oct 7 13:01:00 2011] fullrun_ccd0_acisf10906_pi14-548_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src53.ximg exists [Fri Oct 7 13:01:00 2011] fullrun_ccd0_acisf10906_pi14-548_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src53_1.ximg exists [Fri Oct 7 13:01:00 2011] Fit fullrun_ccd0_acisf10906_pi14-548_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src53 appears to have run properly [Fri Oct 7 13:02:03 2011] Warning, spatial fit 53 centroid is now closest to src. 64 [Fri Oct 7 13:02:03 2011] Vigneting correction estimate = 1.000000 [Fri Oct 7 13:02:03 2011] Source flux estimate in the 0.3-8.0 bandpass, Gamma=1.800000 = 0 [Fri Oct 7 13:02:03 2011] Assessing source extent using major [Fri Oct 7 13:02:03 2011] Source does appear to be extended [Fri Oct 7 13:02:03 2011] Computing asymmetry using major and minor axis, asym = 1.04 [Fri Oct 7 13:02:03 2011] Source is confused with source 64 [Fri Oct 7 13:04:07 2011] Using EEF radius (= 0.84 ")to estimate initial spatial extent for simple fitting [Fri Oct 7 13:04:07 2011] Initial guess for spatial extent in simple fitting = 0.84" [Fri Oct 7 13:04:07 2011] source mask rpix=1.7, npix_max = 19, mask sum = 20, frac = 1.023 [Fri Oct 7 13:04:07 2011] Giving source the simple spatial ID 43 for pass 1, mean size = 0.84" [Fri Oct 7 13:04:10 2011] fullrun_ccd0_acisf10906_pi14-548_cl_pass1_src43.ximg exists [Fri Oct 7 13:04:10 2011] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_ccd0_acisf10906_pi14-548_cl_pass1_src43.csv [Fri Oct 7 13:04:10 2011] fullrun_ccd0_acisf10906_pi14-548_cl_pass1_src43_1.ximg exists [Fri Oct 7 13:04:10 2011] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_ccd0_acisf10906_pi14-548_cl_pass1_src43.csv [Fri Oct 7 13:04:10 2011] It looks like the fit did not converge You should probably delete fullrun_ccd0_acisf10906_pi14-548_cl_pass1_src43_1.ximg Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_ccd0_acisf10906_pi14-548_cl_pass1_src43.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes [Fri Oct 7 13:04:12 2011] fullrun_ccd0_acisf10906_pi14-548_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src43.ximg exists [Fri Oct 7 13:04:12 2011] fullrun_ccd0_acisf10906_pi14-548_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src43_1.ximg exists [Fri Oct 7 13:04:12 2011] Fit fullrun_ccd0_acisf10906_pi14-548_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src43 appears to have run properly [Fri Oct 7 13:05:18 2011] Warning: source 2 in spatial fitting list does not appear to have a counterpart in memory, closest src. was src. 63 at 33.156025 pixels away [Fri Oct 7 13:05:18 2011] Warning: source 15 in spatial fitting list does not appear to have a counterpart in memory, closest src. was src. 63 at 13.340959 pixels away [Fri Oct 7 13:05:18 2011] Spatial fit model total counts = 1040.450000, observed total counts = 1045.000000 [Fri Oct 7 13:05:18 2011] Offset between fit and detection position for source 63 = 0.855034 pixels [Fri Oct 7 13:05:18 2011] 1089.897400 total counts/ 1057.270000 bgd. counts: snr = 1.003436 Spatial fit parameters: Offset between fit and detection position for source 63 = 0.855034 pixels Position = (1022.2, 799.2) = 0 25 57.94 64 7 49.7 Extent = 0.6 (0.2-1.7)", rotation angle = 0 Source counts = 32.6 +/- 33.0 Background counts = 1057.3 Rate = 0.0008 +/- 0.0008 Deleting source due to low Poisson probability