[Mon Sep 26 11:47:27 2011] Detection parameters:
  Position = (515.5, 591.5) = 0 24 46.71 64 8 55.9
  Extent = 0.5" x 0.5", rotation angle = 57 degrees
  Source counts = 305.1 +/- 27.3
  Background counts = 440.9
  Rate = 0.009 +/- 0.0008

[Mon Sep 26 11:48:14 2011] Off-axis axis estimate = 3.89'
[Mon Sep 26 11:55:26 2011] Using EEF radius (= 0.80 ")to estimate initial spatial extent for simple fitting
[Mon Sep 26 11:55:26 2011] Initial guess for spatial extent in simple fitting = 0.80"
[Mon Sep 26 11:55:26 2011] source mask rpix=1.6, npix_max = 18, mask sum = 25, frac = 1.389
[Mon Sep 26 11:55:26 2011] Giving source the simple spatial ID 47 for pass 0, mean size = 0.80"
[Mon Sep 26 11:55:36 2011] fullrun_ccd3_acisf10904_pi14-548_cl_pass0_src47.ximg exists
[Mon Sep 26 11:55:36 2011] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_ccd3_acisf10904_pi14-548_cl_pass0_src47.csv
[Mon Sep 26 11:55:36 2011] fullrun_ccd3_acisf10904_pi14-548_cl_pass0_src47_1.ximg exists
[Mon Sep 26 11:55:36 2011] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_ccd3_acisf10904_pi14-548_cl_pass0_src47.csv
[Mon Sep 26 11:55:36 2011] It looks like the fit did not converge
You should probably delete fullrun_ccd3_acisf10904_pi14-548_cl_pass0_src47_1.ximg
Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_ccd3_acisf10904_pi14-548_cl_pass0_src47.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes
[Mon Sep 26 11:55:48 2011] fullrun_ccd3_acisf10904_pi14-548_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src47.ximg exists
[Mon Sep 26 11:55:48 2011] fullrun_ccd3_acisf10904_pi14-548_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src47_1.ximg exists
[Mon Sep 26 11:55:48 2011] Fit fullrun_ccd3_acisf10904_pi14-548_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src47 appears to have run properly
[Mon Sep 26 11:57:10 2011] Warning, spatial fit 47 centroid is now closest to src. 42
[Mon Sep 26 11:57:10 2011] Vigneting correction estimate = 1.000000
[Mon Sep 26 11:57:10 2011] Source flux estimate in the 0.3-8.0 bandpass, Gamma=1.800000 = 0 
[Mon Sep 26 11:57:10 2011] Assessing source extent using major
[Mon Sep 26 11:57:10 2011] Source does appear to be extended
[Mon Sep 26 11:57:10 2011] Computing asymmetry using major and minor axis, asym = 1.05
[Mon Sep 26 11:57:11 2011] Source is confused with source 42
[Mon Sep 26 11:59:07 2011] Using EEF radius (= 0.80 ")to estimate initial spatial extent for simple fitting
[Mon Sep 26 11:59:07 2011] Initial guess for spatial extent in simple fitting = 0.80"
[Mon Sep 26 11:59:07 2011] source mask rpix=1.6, npix_max = 18, mask sum = 25, frac = 1.389
[Mon Sep 26 11:59:07 2011] Giving source the simple spatial ID 45 for pass 1, mean size = 0.80"
[Mon Sep 26 11:59:12 2011] fullrun_ccd3_acisf10904_pi14-548_cl_pass1_src45.ximg exists
[Mon Sep 26 11:59:12 2011] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_ccd3_acisf10904_pi14-548_cl_pass1_src45.csv
[Mon Sep 26 11:59:12 2011] fullrun_ccd3_acisf10904_pi14-548_cl_pass1_src45_1.ximg exists
[Mon Sep 26 11:59:12 2011] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_ccd3_acisf10904_pi14-548_cl_pass1_src45.csv
[Mon Sep 26 11:59:12 2011] It looks like the fit did not converge
You should probably delete fullrun_ccd3_acisf10904_pi14-548_cl_pass1_src45_1.ximg
Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_ccd3_acisf10904_pi14-548_cl_pass1_src45.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes
[Mon Sep 26 11:59:23 2011] fullrun_ccd3_acisf10904_pi14-548_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src45.ximg exists
[Mon Sep 26 11:59:23 2011] fullrun_ccd3_acisf10904_pi14-548_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src45_1.ximg exists
[Mon Sep 26 11:59:23 2011] Fit fullrun_ccd3_acisf10904_pi14-548_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src45 appears to have run properly
[Mon Sep 26 12:00:34 2011] Source 44 is offset by -0.743890 and -7.031915 pixels which is larger than
2 X fitted extent = 1.019272 x 1.019272, not incorporating fit results
[Mon Sep 26 12:00:34 2011] Warning: source 58 in spatial fitting list does not appear to have a counterpart in memory, closest src. was src. 44 at 21.933403 pixels away
[Mon Sep 26 12:00:34 2011] Spatial fit model total counts = 1612.870000, observed total counts = 1612.000000
[Mon Sep 26 12:00:34 2011] Offset between fit and detection position for source 44 = 7.318172 pixels
[Mon Sep 26 12:00:34 2011] Warning, changing simple spatial fit ID from 45 to 77
[Mon Sep 26 12:00:34 2011] 1654.320017 total counts/ 1654.320000 bgd. counts: snr = 0.000000
Spatial fit parameters:
  Offset between fit and detection position for source 44 = 7.318172 pixels
  Position = (508.3, 590.3) = 0 24 47.29 64 8 55.1
  Extent = 2.3 (0.3-4.3)", rotation angle = 0
  Source counts = 0.0 +/- 40.7
  Background counts = 1654.3
  Rate = 5e-10 +/- 0.001
  Deleting source due to low Poisson probability