[Mon Sep 26 11:46:11 2011] Detection parameters:
  Position = (1128.7, 563.9) = 0 25 44.64 64 4 59.1
  Extent = 0.7" x 0.5", rotation angle = 16 degrees
  Source counts = 10.7 +/- 4.4
  Background counts = 8.3
  Rate = 0.0003 +/- 0.0001

[Mon Sep 26 11:46:19 2011] Off-axis axis estimate = 4.29'
[Mon Sep 26 11:54:34 2011] Using EEF radius (= 0.92 ")to estimate initial spatial extent for simple fitting
[Mon Sep 26 11:54:34 2011] Initial guess for spatial extent in simple fitting = 0.92"
[Mon Sep 26 11:54:34 2011] source mask rpix=1.9, npix_max = 22, mask sum = 20, frac = 0.888
[Mon Sep 26 11:54:34 2011] Giving source the simple spatial ID 79 for pass 0, mean size = 0.92"
[Mon Sep 26 11:54:39 2011] fullrun_ccd0_acisf10904_pi14-548_cl_pass0_src79.ximg exists
[Mon Sep 26 11:54:39 2011] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_ccd0_acisf10904_pi14-548_cl_pass0_src79.csv
[Mon Sep 26 11:54:39 2011] fullrun_ccd0_acisf10904_pi14-548_cl_pass0_src79_1.ximg exists
[Mon Sep 26 11:54:39 2011] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_ccd0_acisf10904_pi14-548_cl_pass0_src79.csv
[Mon Sep 26 11:54:39 2011] It looks like the fit did not converge
You should probably delete fullrun_ccd0_acisf10904_pi14-548_cl_pass0_src79_1.ximg
Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_ccd0_acisf10904_pi14-548_cl_pass0_src79.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes
[Mon Sep 26 11:54:52 2011] fullrun_ccd0_acisf10904_pi14-548_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src79.ximg exists
[Mon Sep 26 11:54:52 2011] fullrun_ccd0_acisf10904_pi14-548_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src79_1.ximg exists
[Mon Sep 26 11:54:52 2011] Fit fullrun_ccd0_acisf10904_pi14-548_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src79 appears to have run properly
[Mon Sep 26 11:56:26 2011] Source 89 is offset by 3.538376 and 4.812229 pixels which is larger than
2 X fitted extent = 0.936565 x 0.936565, not incorporating fit results
[Mon Sep 26 11:56:27 2011] Vigneting correction estimate = 1.000000
[Mon Sep 26 11:56:27 2011] Source flux estimate in the 0.3-8.0 bandpass, Gamma=1.800000 = 0 
[Mon Sep 26 11:56:27 2011] Assessing source extent using major
[Mon Sep 26 11:56:27 2011] Source does appear to be extended
[Mon Sep 26 11:56:27 2011] Computing asymmetry using major and minor axis, asym = 1.44
[Mon Sep 26 11:56:27 2011] Deleting source due to low Poisson probability 0.7