[Mon Oct 24 20:18:40 2011] Detection parameters: Position = (118.3, 844.7) = 5 26 1.62 -66 4 46.2 Extent = 0.7" x 0.7", rotation angle = 169 degrees Source counts = 470.1 +/- 33.8 Background counts = 669.9 Rate = 0.02 +/- 0.001 [Mon Oct 24 20:18:42 2011] Off-axis axis estimate = 0.31' [Mon Oct 24 20:19:47 2011] Using EEF radius (= 0.40 ")to estimate initial spatial extent for simple fitting [Mon Oct 24 20:19:47 2011] Initial guess for spatial extent in simple fitting = 0.40" [Mon Oct 24 20:19:47 2011] source mask rpix=0.8, npix_max = 6, mask sum = 9, frac = 1.290 [Mon Oct 24 20:19:47 2011] Giving source the simple spatial ID 27 for pass 0, mean size = 0.40" [Mon Oct 24 20:19:49 2011] fullrun_ccd7_acisf10807_pi14-548_cl_pass0_src27.ximg exists [Mon Oct 24 20:19:49 2011] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_ccd7_acisf10807_pi14-548_cl_pass0_src27.csv [Mon Oct 24 20:19:49 2011] fullrun_ccd7_acisf10807_pi14-548_cl_pass0_src27_1.ximg exists [Mon Oct 24 20:19:49 2011] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_ccd7_acisf10807_pi14-548_cl_pass0_src27.csv [Mon Oct 24 20:19:49 2011] It looks like the fit did not converge You should probably delete fullrun_ccd7_acisf10807_pi14-548_cl_pass0_src27_1.ximg Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_ccd7_acisf10807_pi14-548_cl_pass0_src27.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes [Mon Oct 24 20:19:50 2011] fullrun_ccd7_acisf10807_pi14-548_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src27.ximg exists [Mon Oct 24 20:19:50 2011] fullrun_ccd7_acisf10807_pi14-548_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src27_1.ximg exists [Mon Oct 24 20:19:50 2011] Fit fullrun_ccd7_acisf10807_pi14-548_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src27 appears to have run properly [Mon Oct 24 20:20:03 2011] Spatial fit model total counts = 2937.290000, observed total counts = 2933.000000 [Mon Oct 24 20:20:03 2011] Offset between fit and detection position for source 28 = 1.109137 pixels [Mon Oct 24 20:20:03 2011] 2949.680000 total counts/ 2783.640000 bgd. counts: snr = 3.147068 Spatial fit parameters: Offset between fit and detection position for source 28 = 1.109137 pixels Position = (118.4, 845.8) = 5 26 1.65 -66 4 45.9 Extent = 0.9 (0.6-1.2)", rotation angle = 0 Source counts = 166.0 +/- 54.3 Background counts = 2783.6 Rate = 0.006 +/- 0.002 [Mon Oct 24 20:20:03 2011] Vigneting correction estimate = 1.000000 [Mon Oct 24 20:20:03 2011] Source flux estimate in the 0.3-8.0 bandpass, Gamma=1.800000 = 0 [Mon Oct 24 20:20:03 2011] Assessing source extent using major axis lower bound [Mon Oct 24 20:20:03 2011] Source does appear to be extended [Mon Oct 24 20:20:03 2011] Computing asymmetry using major and minor axis, asym = 1.00 [Mon Oct 24 20:20:16 2011] Using previous fit value to estimate initial spatial extent for simple fitting [Mon Oct 24 20:20:16 2011] Initial guess for spatial extent in simple fitting = 0.86" [Mon Oct 24 20:20:16 2011] source mask rpix=1.8, npix_max = 20, mask sum = 20, frac = 0.987 [Mon Oct 24 20:20:16 2011] Giving source the simple spatial ID 27 for pass 1, mean size = 0.86" [Mon Oct 24 20:20:18 2011] fullrun_ccd7_acisf10807_pi14-548_cl_pass1_src27.ximg exists [Mon Oct 24 20:20:18 2011] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_ccd7_acisf10807_pi14-548_cl_pass1_src27.csv [Mon Oct 24 20:20:18 2011] fullrun_ccd7_acisf10807_pi14-548_cl_pass1_src27_1.ximg exists [Mon Oct 24 20:20:18 2011] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_ccd7_acisf10807_pi14-548_cl_pass1_src27.csv [Mon Oct 24 20:20:18 2011] It looks like the fit did not converge You should probably delete fullrun_ccd7_acisf10807_pi14-548_cl_pass1_src27_1.ximg Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_ccd7_acisf10807_pi14-548_cl_pass1_src27.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes [Mon Oct 24 20:20:19 2011] fullrun_ccd7_acisf10807_pi14-548_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src27.ximg exists [Mon Oct 24 20:20:19 2011] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_ccd7_acisf10807_pi14-548_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src27.csv [Mon Oct 24 20:20:19 2011] fullrun_ccd7_acisf10807_pi14-548_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src27_1.ximg exists [Mon Oct 24 20:20:19 2011] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_ccd7_acisf10807_pi14-548_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src27.csv [Mon Oct 24 20:20:19 2011] It looks like the fit did not converge You should probably delete fullrun_ccd7_acisf10807_pi14-548_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src27_1.ximg Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_ccd7_acisf10807_pi14-548_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src27.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes [Mon Oct 24 20:20:32 2011] Spatial fit model total counts = 2294.530000, observed total counts = 3007.000000 [Mon Oct 24 20:20:32 2011] Poor agreement between spatial fit and data for source 28 It may help to tweak spatial fit manually Not incorporating fit results [Mon Oct 24 20:20:32 2011] Spatial fit model total counts = 3086.060000, observed total counts = 3083.000000 [Mon Oct 24 20:20:32 2011] Offset between fit and detection position for source 28 = 0.691131 pixels [Mon Oct 24 20:20:32 2011] Warning, changing simple spatial fit ID from 27 to 29 [Mon Oct 24 20:20:32 2011] 3139.009000 total counts/ 3104.630000 bgd. counts: snr = 0.617004 Spatial fit parameters: Offset between fit and detection position for source 28 = 0.691131 pixels Position = (117.8, 846.3) = 5 26 1.69 -66 4 45.7 Extent = 0.4 (0.2-0.7)", rotation angle = 0 Source counts = 34.4 +/- 56.0 Background counts = 3104.6 Rate = 0.001 +/- 0.002 Deleting source due to low Poisson probability