[Wed Oct  5 12:13:49 2011] Detection parameters:
  Position = (65.4, 670.5) = 9 26 44.92 29 34 9.1
  Extent = 3.0" x 1.6", rotation angle = 64 degrees
  Source counts = 18.4 +/- 6.8
  Background counts = 27.6
  Rate = 0.0007 +/- 0.0003

[Wed Oct  5 12:13:49 2011] Off-axis axis estimate = 11.03'
[Wed Oct  5 12:15:01 2011] Using EEF radius (= 5.41 ")to estimate initial spatial extent for simple fitting
[Wed Oct  5 12:15:01 2011] Initial guess for spatial extent in simple fitting = 5.41"
[Wed Oct  5 12:15:01 2011] source mask rpix=11.0, npix_max = 528, mask sum = 529, frac = 1.000
[Wed Oct  5 12:15:01 2011] Giving source the simple spatial ID 3 for pass 0, mean size = 5.41"
[Wed Oct  5 12:15:01 2011] fullrun_ccd5_acisf10721_pi14-548_cl_pass0_src3.ximg exists
[Wed Oct  5 12:15:02 2011] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_ccd5_acisf10721_pi14-548_cl_pass0_src3.csv
[Wed Oct  5 12:15:02 2011] fullrun_ccd5_acisf10721_pi14-548_cl_pass0_src3_1.ximg exists
[Wed Oct  5 12:15:02 2011] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_ccd5_acisf10721_pi14-548_cl_pass0_src3.csv
[Wed Oct  5 12:15:02 2011] It looks like the fit did not converge
You should probably delete fullrun_ccd5_acisf10721_pi14-548_cl_pass0_src3_1.ximg
Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_ccd5_acisf10721_pi14-548_cl_pass0_src3.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes
[Wed Oct  5 12:15:02 2011] fullrun_ccd5_acisf10721_pi14-548_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src3.ximg exists
[Wed Oct  5 12:15:02 2011] fullrun_ccd5_acisf10721_pi14-548_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src3_1.ximg exists
[Wed Oct  5 12:15:02 2011] Fit fullrun_ccd5_acisf10721_pi14-548_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src3 appears to have run properly
[Wed Oct  5 12:15:13 2011] Spatial fit model total counts = 254.773000, observed total counts = 231.000000
[Wed Oct  5 12:15:13 2011] Poor agreement between spatial fit and data for source 1
It may help to tweak spatial fit manually
Not incorporating fit results
[Wed Oct  5 12:15:13 2011] Vigneting correction estimate = 1.000000
[Wed Oct  5 12:15:13 2011] Source flux estimate in the 0.3-8.0 bandpass, Gamma=1.800000 = 0 
[Wed Oct  5 12:15:13 2011] Assessing source extent using major
[Wed Oct  5 12:15:13 2011] Source does appear to be extended
[Wed Oct  5 12:15:13 2011] Computing asymmetry using major and minor axis, asym = 1.85
[Wed Oct  5 12:15:13 2011] Source is asymmetric
[Wed Oct  5 12:15:13 2011] Deleting source due to low Poisson probability 0.8