[Thu Sep 22 07:59:31 2011] Detection parameters: Position = (512.6, 963.2) = 7 42 35.48 74 7 9.6 Extent = 0.6" x 0.5", rotation angle = 6 degrees Source counts = 12.1 +/- 3.9 Background counts = 2.9 Rate = 9e-05 +/- 3e-05 [Thu Sep 22 07:59:32 2011] Off-axis axis estimate = 5.92' [Thu Sep 22 08:02:06 2011] Using EEF radius (= 1.59 ")to estimate initial spatial extent for simple fitting [Thu Sep 22 08:02:06 2011] Initial guess for spatial extent in simple fitting = 1.59" [Thu Sep 22 08:02:06 2011] source mask rpix=3.2, npix_max = 55, mask sum = 56, frac = 1.003 [Thu Sep 22 08:02:06 2011] Giving source the simple spatial ID 10 for pass 0, mean size = 1.59" [Thu Sep 22 08:02:07 2011] fullrun_ccd0_acisf10470_pi14-548_cl_pass0_src10.ximg exists [Thu Sep 22 08:02:07 2011] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_ccd0_acisf10470_pi14-548_cl_pass0_src10.csv [Thu Sep 22 08:02:07 2011] fullrun_ccd0_acisf10470_pi14-548_cl_pass0_src10_1.ximg exists [Thu Sep 22 08:02:07 2011] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_ccd0_acisf10470_pi14-548_cl_pass0_src10.csv [Thu Sep 22 08:02:07 2011] It looks like the fit did not converge You should probably delete fullrun_ccd0_acisf10470_pi14-548_cl_pass0_src10_1.ximg Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_ccd0_acisf10470_pi14-548_cl_pass0_src10.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes [Thu Sep 22 08:02:07 2011] fullrun_ccd0_acisf10470_pi14-548_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src10.ximg exists [Thu Sep 22 08:02:07 2011] fullrun_ccd0_acisf10470_pi14-548_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src10_1.ximg exists [Thu Sep 22 08:02:07 2011] Fit fullrun_ccd0_acisf10470_pi14-548_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src10 appears to have run properly [Thu Sep 22 08:02:50 2011] Warning: source 10 in spatial fitting list does not appear to have a counterpart in memory, closest src. was src. 13 at 17.319843 pixels away [Thu Sep 22 08:02:50 2011] Vigneting correction estimate = 1.000000 [Thu Sep 22 08:02:50 2011] Source flux estimate in the 0.3-8.0 bandpass, Gamma=1.800000 = 0 [Thu Sep 22 08:02:50 2011] Assessing source extent using major [Thu Sep 22 08:02:50 2011] Source does appear to be extended [Thu Sep 22 08:02:50 2011] Computing asymmetry using major and minor axis, asym = 1.31 [Thu Sep 22 08:03:35 2011] Using EEF radius (= 1.59 ")to estimate initial spatial extent for simple fitting [Thu Sep 22 08:03:35 2011] Initial guess for spatial extent in simple fitting = 1.59" [Thu Sep 22 08:03:35 2011] source mask rpix=3.2, npix_max = 55, mask sum = 56, frac = 1.003 [Thu Sep 22 08:03:35 2011] Giving source the simple spatial ID 10 for pass 1, mean size = 1.59" [Thu Sep 22 08:03:38 2011] fullrun_ccd0_acisf10470_pi14-548_cl_pass1_src10.ximg exists [Thu Sep 22 08:03:38 2011] fullrun_ccd0_acisf10470_pi14-548_cl_pass1_src10_1.ximg exists [Thu Sep 22 08:03:38 2011] Fit fullrun_ccd0_acisf10470_pi14-548_cl_pass1_src10 appears to have run properly [Thu Sep 22 08:03:39 2011] fullrun_ccd0_acisf10470_pi14-548_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src10.ximg exists [Thu Sep 22 08:03:39 2011] fullrun_ccd0_acisf10470_pi14-548_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src10_1.ximg exists [Thu Sep 22 08:03:39 2011] Fit fullrun_ccd0_acisf10470_pi14-548_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src10 appears to have run properly [Thu Sep 22 08:04:06 2011] Warning: source 10 in spatial fitting list does not appear to have a counterpart in memory, closest src. was src. 13 at 17.319843 pixels away [Thu Sep 22 08:04:06 2011] Warning: source 15 in spatial fitting list does not appear to have a counterpart in memory, closest src. was src. 13 at 83.318791 pixels away [Thu Sep 22 08:04:06 2011] Vigneting correction estimate = 1.000000 [Thu Sep 22 08:04:06 2011] Source flux estimate in the 0.3-8.0 bandpass, Gamma=1.800000 = 0 [Thu Sep 22 08:04:06 2011] Assessing source extent using major [Thu Sep 22 08:04:06 2011] Source does appear to be extended [Thu Sep 22 08:04:06 2011] Computing asymmetry using major and minor axis, asym = 1.31 [Thu Sep 22 08:04:06 2011] Deleting source due to low Poisson probability 1.0