[Sat Oct 22 05:48:45 2011] Detection parameters:
  Position = (658.9, 806.3) = 14 29 15.00 33 51 14.1
  Extent = 0.9" x 0.5", rotation angle = 93 degrees
  Source counts = 13.2 +/- 3.7
  Background counts = 0.8
  Rate = 0.0006 +/- 0.0002

[Sat Oct 22 05:48:46 2011] Off-axis axis estimate = 5.88'
[Sat Oct 22 05:49:38 2011] Using EEF radius (= 1.57 ")to estimate initial spatial extent for simple fitting
[Sat Oct 22 05:49:38 2011] Initial guess for spatial extent in simple fitting = 1.57"
[Sat Oct 22 05:49:38 2011] source mask rpix=3.2, npix_max = 54, mask sum = 56, frac = 1.030
[Sat Oct 22 05:49:38 2011] Giving source the simple spatial ID 9 for pass 0, mean size = 1.57"
[Sat Oct 22 05:49:38 2011] fullrun_ccd0_acisf10450_pi14-548_cl_pass0_src9.ximg exists
[Sat Oct 22 05:49:38 2011] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_ccd0_acisf10450_pi14-548_cl_pass0_src9.csv
[Sat Oct 22 05:49:38 2011] fullrun_ccd0_acisf10450_pi14-548_cl_pass0_src9_1.ximg exists
[Sat Oct 22 05:49:38 2011] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_ccd0_acisf10450_pi14-548_cl_pass0_src9.csv
[Sat Oct 22 05:49:38 2011] It looks like the fit did not converge
You should probably delete fullrun_ccd0_acisf10450_pi14-548_cl_pass0_src9_1.ximg
Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_ccd0_acisf10450_pi14-548_cl_pass0_src9.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes
[Sat Oct 22 05:49:39 2011] fullrun_ccd0_acisf10450_pi14-548_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src9.ximg exists
[Sat Oct 22 05:49:39 2011] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_ccd0_acisf10450_pi14-548_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src9.csv
[Sat Oct 22 05:49:39 2011] fullrun_ccd0_acisf10450_pi14-548_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src9_1.ximg exists
[Sat Oct 22 05:49:39 2011] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_ccd0_acisf10450_pi14-548_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src9.csv
[Sat Oct 22 05:49:39 2011] It looks like the fit did not converge
You should probably delete fullrun_ccd0_acisf10450_pi14-548_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src9_1.ximg
Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_ccd0_acisf10450_pi14-548_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src9.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes
[Sat Oct 22 05:49:48 2011] Warning: source 9 in spatial fitting list does not appear to have a counterpart in memory, closest src. was src. 11 at 18.436036 pixels away
[Sat Oct 22 05:49:48 2011] Vigneting correction estimate = 1.000000
[Sat Oct 22 05:49:48 2011] Source flux estimate in the 0.3-8.0 bandpass, Gamma=1.800000 = 0 
[Sat Oct 22 05:49:48 2011] Assessing source extent using major
[Sat Oct 22 05:49:48 2011] Source does appear to be extended
[Sat Oct 22 05:49:48 2011] Computing asymmetry using major and minor axis, asym = 1.73
[Sat Oct 22 05:49:48 2011] Source is asymmetric
[Sat Oct 22 05:49:48 2011] Deleting source due to low Poisson probability 0.9