[Wed Oct 19 09:37:30 2011] Detection parameters: Position = (1238.8, 772.3) = 9 13 59.84 40 58 31.5 Extent = 0.6" x 0.5", rotation angle = 164 degrees Source counts = 29.3 +/- 5.6 Background counts = 1.7 Rate = 0.0004 +/- 7e-05 [Wed Oct 19 09:37:31 2011] Off-axis axis estimate = 3.59' [Wed Oct 19 09:38:43 2011] Using EEF radius (= 0.72 ")to estimate initial spatial extent for simple fitting [Wed Oct 19 09:38:43 2011] Initial guess for spatial extent in simple fitting = 0.72" [Wed Oct 19 09:38:43 2011] source mask rpix=1.5, npix_max = 15, mask sum = 16, frac = 1.046 [Wed Oct 19 09:38:43 2011] Giving source the simple spatial ID 9 for pass 0, mean size = 0.72" [Wed Oct 19 09:38:43 2011] fullrun_ccd1_acisf10445_pi14-548_cl_pass0_src9.ximg exists [Wed Oct 19 09:38:43 2011] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_ccd1_acisf10445_pi14-548_cl_pass0_src9.csv [Wed Oct 19 09:38:43 2011] fullrun_ccd1_acisf10445_pi14-548_cl_pass0_src9_1.ximg exists [Wed Oct 19 09:38:43 2011] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_ccd1_acisf10445_pi14-548_cl_pass0_src9.csv [Wed Oct 19 09:38:43 2011] It looks like the fit did not converge You should probably delete fullrun_ccd1_acisf10445_pi14-548_cl_pass0_src9_1.ximg Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_ccd1_acisf10445_pi14-548_cl_pass0_src9.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes [Wed Oct 19 09:38:44 2011] fullrun_ccd1_acisf10445_pi14-548_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src9.ximg exists [Wed Oct 19 09:38:44 2011] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_ccd1_acisf10445_pi14-548_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src9.csv [Wed Oct 19 09:38:44 2011] fullrun_ccd1_acisf10445_pi14-548_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src9_1.ximg exists [Wed Oct 19 09:38:44 2011] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_ccd1_acisf10445_pi14-548_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src9.csv [Wed Oct 19 09:38:44 2011] It looks like the fit did not converge You should probably delete fullrun_ccd1_acisf10445_pi14-548_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src9_1.ximg Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_ccd1_acisf10445_pi14-548_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src9.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes [Wed Oct 19 09:38:58 2011] Spatial fit model total counts = 34.519200, observed total counts = 39.000000 [Wed Oct 19 09:38:58 2011] Offset between fit and detection position for source 9 = 0.679879 pixels [Wed Oct 19 09:38:58 2011] 35.145120 total counts/ 5.995320 bgd. counts: snr = 11.905000 Spatial fit parameters: Offset between fit and detection position for source 9 = 0.679879 pixels Position = (1239.1, 772.9) = 9 13 59.85 40 58 31.5 Extent = 0.6 (0.4-0.7)", rotation angle = 0 Source counts = 29.1 +/- 5.9 Background counts = 6.0 Rate = 0.0004 +/- 8e-05 [Wed Oct 19 09:38:58 2011] Vigneting correction estimate = 1.000000 [Wed Oct 19 09:38:58 2011] Source flux estimate in the 0.3-8.0 bandpass, Gamma=1.800000 = 0 [Wed Oct 19 09:38:58 2011] Assessing source extent using major axis lower bound [Wed Oct 19 09:38:58 2011] Source does appear to be extended [Wed Oct 19 09:38:58 2011] Computing asymmetry using major and minor axis, asym = 1.00 [Wed Oct 19 09:39:29 2011] Using previous fit value to estimate initial spatial extent for simple fitting [Wed Oct 19 09:39:29 2011] Initial guess for spatial extent in simple fitting = 0.60" [Wed Oct 19 09:39:29 2011] source mask rpix=1.2, npix_max = 11, mask sum = 16, frac = 1.361 [Wed Oct 19 09:39:29 2011] Giving source the simple spatial ID 9 for pass 1, mean size = 0.60" [Wed Oct 19 09:39:29 2011] fullrun_ccd1_acisf10445_pi14-548_cl_pass1_src9.ximg exists [Wed Oct 19 09:39:29 2011] fullrun_ccd1_acisf10445_pi14-548_cl_pass1_src9_1.ximg exists [Wed Oct 19 09:39:29 2011] Fit fullrun_ccd1_acisf10445_pi14-548_cl_pass1_src9 appears to have run properly [Wed Oct 19 09:39:30 2011] fullrun_ccd1_acisf10445_pi14-548_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src9.ximg exists [Wed Oct 19 09:39:30 2011] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_ccd1_acisf10445_pi14-548_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src9.csv [Wed Oct 19 09:39:30 2011] fullrun_ccd1_acisf10445_pi14-548_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src9_1.ximg exists [Wed Oct 19 09:39:30 2011] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_ccd1_acisf10445_pi14-548_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src9.csv [Wed Oct 19 09:39:30 2011] It looks like the fit did not converge You should probably delete fullrun_ccd1_acisf10445_pi14-548_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src9_1.ximg Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_ccd1_acisf10445_pi14-548_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src9.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes [Wed Oct 19 09:39:41 2011] Warning, spatial fit 9 centroid is now closest to src. 17 [Wed Oct 19 09:39:41 2011] Vigneting correction estimate = 1.000000 [Wed Oct 19 09:39:41 2011] Source flux estimate in the 0.3-8.0 bandpass, Gamma=1.800000 = 0 [Wed Oct 19 09:39:41 2011] Assessing source extent using major axis lower bound [Wed Oct 19 09:39:41 2011] Source does appear to be extended [Wed Oct 19 09:39:41 2011] Computing asymmetry using major and minor axis, asym = 1.00 [Wed Oct 19 09:40:49 2011] Not overwriting source region fullrun_ccd1_acisf10445_pi14-548_pass1_cl_src9_src.reg [Wed Oct 19 09:40:49 2011] Extracting stamp from image fullrun_ccd1_acisf10445_pi14-548_cl_sm2.00.img.gz, (1212, 746) - (1266, 800) [Wed Oct 19 09:40:49 2011] Writing fullrun_ccd1_acisf10445_pi14-548_pass1_cl_src9.gif [Wed Oct 19 09:41:12 2011] ../../acisf10445/products/events/fullrun_ccd1_acisf10445_pi14-548_pass1_cl_src9_src.evt and ../../acisf10445/products/events/fullrun_ccd1_acisf10445_pi14-548_pass1_cl_src9_bgd.evt exist, delete to re-create [Wed Oct 19 09:41:12 2011] Size of ../../acisf10445/products/events/fullrun_ccd1_acisf10445_pi14-548_pass1_cl_src9_src.evt.gz[events] = 35 counts [Wed Oct 19 09:41:12 2011] Mean chipx,y = (50.86, 826.94) [Wed Oct 19 09:41:12 2011] Mean tdetx,y = (4305.06, 4157.86) [Wed Oct 19 09:41:12 2011] chipx,y range = (30.00-71.00, 808.00-845.00) [Wed Oct 19 09:41:12 2011] Size of ../../acisf10445/products/events/fullrun_ccd1_acisf10445_pi14-548_pass1_cl_src9_bgd.evt.gz[events] = 22 counts [Wed Oct 19 09:41:12 2011] ../../acisf10445/products/images/fullrun_ccd1_acisf10445_pi14-548_pass1_cl_src9_src.img and ../../acisf10445/products/images/fullrun_ccd1_acisf10445_pi14-548_pass1_cl_src9_bgd.img exist, delete to re-create [Wed Oct 19 09:41:12 2011] ../../acisf10445/products/spectra/fullrun_ccd1_acisf10445_pi14-548_pass1_cl_src9_src.pi and ../../acisf10445/products/spectra/fullrun_ccd1_acisf10445_pi14-548_pass1_cl_src9_bgd.pi exist, delete to re-create [Wed Oct 19 09:41:12 2011] Not generating rmf since there are only 29 counts [Wed Oct 19 09:41:15 2011] ../../acisf10445/products/lightcurves/fullrun_ccd1_acisf10445_pi14-548_pass1_cl_src9_src.lc and ../../acisf10445/products/lightcurves/fullrun_ccd1_acisf10445_pi14-548_pass1_cl_src9_bgd.lc exist, delete to re-create [Wed Oct 19 09:41:51 2011] 190.358 [Wed Oct 19 09:44:20 2011] Updating aperture counts using extracted products [Wed Oct 19 09:44:20 2011] Error reading totcts from fullrun_ccd1_acisf10445_pi14-548_pass1_cl_src9_src.pi.gz [Wed Oct 19 09:44:20 2011] Calculating source flux in energy range 0.30-8.00 [Wed Oct 19 09:44:20 2011] Using photon index=1.80, rate=0.000383, arf fullrun_ccd1_acisf10445_pi14-548_pass1_cl_src9.arf [Wed Oct 19 09:44:20 2011] Assuming count rate is from the 0.20-8.00 bandpass [Wed Oct 19 09:44:20 2011] Updating source flux to 4.7e-15 [Wed Oct 19 09:44:37 2011] Source 9 has fewer than 100.000000 counts, skipping spectral fitting