[Fri Oct  7 21:11:42 2011] Detection parameters:
  Position = (699.7, 1171.6) = 22 49 59.16 11 35 1.6
  Extent = 0.6" x 0.5", rotation angle = 101 degrees
  Source counts = 10.1 +/- 3.3
  Background counts = 0.9
  Rate = 0.0003 +/- 8e-05

[Fri Oct  7 21:11:45 2011] Off-axis axis estimate = 2.25'
[Fri Oct  7 21:13:01 2011] Using EEF radius (= 0.46 ")to estimate initial spatial extent for simple fitting
[Fri Oct  7 21:13:01 2011] Initial guess for spatial extent in simple fitting = 0.46"
[Fri Oct  7 21:13:01 2011] source mask rpix=0.9, npix_max = 8, mask sum = 9, frac = 1.099
[Fri Oct  7 21:13:01 2011] Giving source the simple spatial ID 17 for pass 0, mean size = 0.46"
[Fri Oct  7 21:13:01 2011] fullrun_ccd3_acisf10233_pi14-548_cl_pass0_src17.ximg exists
[Fri Oct  7 21:13:01 2011] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_ccd3_acisf10233_pi14-548_cl_pass0_src17.csv
[Fri Oct  7 21:13:01 2011] fullrun_ccd3_acisf10233_pi14-548_cl_pass0_src17_1.ximg exists
[Fri Oct  7 21:13:01 2011] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_ccd3_acisf10233_pi14-548_cl_pass0_src17.csv
[Fri Oct  7 21:13:01 2011] It looks like the fit did not converge
You should probably delete fullrun_ccd3_acisf10233_pi14-548_cl_pass0_src17_1.ximg
Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_ccd3_acisf10233_pi14-548_cl_pass0_src17.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes
[Fri Oct  7 21:13:02 2011] fullrun_ccd3_acisf10233_pi14-548_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src17.ximg exists
[Fri Oct  7 21:13:02 2011] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_ccd3_acisf10233_pi14-548_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src17.csv
[Fri Oct  7 21:13:02 2011] fullrun_ccd3_acisf10233_pi14-548_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src17_1.ximg exists
[Fri Oct  7 21:13:02 2011] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_ccd3_acisf10233_pi14-548_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src17.csv
[Fri Oct  7 21:13:02 2011] It looks like the fit did not converge
You should probably delete fullrun_ccd3_acisf10233_pi14-548_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src17_1.ximg
Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_ccd3_acisf10233_pi14-548_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src17.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes
[Fri Oct  7 21:13:22 2011] Spatial fit model total counts = 9.133340, observed total counts = 12.000000
[Fri Oct  7 21:13:22 2011] Offset between fit and detection position for source 14 = 0.670291 pixels
[Fri Oct  7 21:13:22 2011] 9.519936 total counts/ 0.180616 bgd. counts: snr = 21.975418
Spatial fit parameters:
  Offset between fit and detection position for source 14 = 0.670291 pixels
  Position = (700.3, 1171.7) = 22 49 59.15 11 35 1.4
  Extent = 0.4 (0.3-0.5)", rotation angle = 0
  Source counts = 9.3 +/- 3.1
  Background counts = 0.2
  Rate = 0.0002 +/- 8e-05
[Fri Oct  7 21:13:22 2011] Vigneting correction estimate = 1.000000
[Fri Oct  7 21:13:22 2011] Source flux estimate in the 0.3-8.0 bandpass, Gamma=1.800000 = 0 
[Fri Oct  7 21:13:22 2011] Assessing source extent using major axis lower bound
[Fri Oct  7 21:13:22 2011] Source does appear to be extended
[Fri Oct  7 21:13:22 2011] Computing asymmetry using major and minor axis, asym = 1.00
[Fri Oct  7 21:13:22 2011] Deleting source due to low Poisson probability 1.0