[Thu Sep 29 13:51:29 2011] Detection parameters:
  Position = (118.5, 841.7) = 18 28 55.91 -12 54 56.6
  Extent = 0.5" x 0.5", rotation angle = 180 degrees
  Source counts = 11.3 +/- 3.6
  Background counts = 1.7
  Rate = 0.0003 +/- 8e-05

[Thu Sep 29 13:51:31 2011] Off-axis axis estimate = 2.18'
[Thu Sep 29 13:52:59 2011] Using EEF radius (= 0.45 ")to estimate initial spatial extent for simple fitting
[Thu Sep 29 13:52:59 2011] Initial guess for spatial extent in simple fitting = 0.45"
[Thu Sep 29 13:52:59 2011] source mask rpix=0.9, npix_max = 8, mask sum = 9, frac = 1.124
[Thu Sep 29 13:52:59 2011] Giving source the simple spatial ID 4 for pass 0, mean size = 0.45"
[Thu Sep 29 13:52:59 2011] fullrun_ccd0_acisf10098_pi14-548_cl_pass0_src4.ximg exists
[Thu Sep 29 13:52:59 2011] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_ccd0_acisf10098_pi14-548_cl_pass0_src4.csv
[Thu Sep 29 13:52:59 2011] fullrun_ccd0_acisf10098_pi14-548_cl_pass0_src4_1.ximg exists
[Thu Sep 29 13:52:59 2011] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_ccd0_acisf10098_pi14-548_cl_pass0_src4.csv
[Thu Sep 29 13:52:59 2011] It looks like the fit did not converge
You should probably delete fullrun_ccd0_acisf10098_pi14-548_cl_pass0_src4_1.ximg
Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_ccd0_acisf10098_pi14-548_cl_pass0_src4.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes
[Thu Sep 29 13:53:00 2011] fullrun_ccd0_acisf10098_pi14-548_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src4.ximg exists
[Thu Sep 29 13:53:00 2011] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_ccd0_acisf10098_pi14-548_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src4.csv
[Thu Sep 29 13:53:00 2011] fullrun_ccd0_acisf10098_pi14-548_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src4_1.ximg exists
[Thu Sep 29 13:53:00 2011] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_ccd0_acisf10098_pi14-548_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src4.csv
[Thu Sep 29 13:53:00 2011] It looks like the fit did not converge
You should probably delete fullrun_ccd0_acisf10098_pi14-548_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src4_1.ximg
Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_ccd0_acisf10098_pi14-548_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src4.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes
[Thu Sep 29 13:53:10 2011] Spatial fit model total counts = 15.608200, observed total counts = 21.000000
[Thu Sep 29 13:53:10 2011] Poor agreement between spatial fit and data for source 7
It may help to tweak spatial fit manually
Not incorporating fit results
[Thu Sep 29 13:53:10 2011] Vigneting correction estimate = 1.000000
[Thu Sep 29 13:53:10 2011] Source flux estimate in the 0.3-8.0 bandpass, Gamma=1.800000 = 0 
[Thu Sep 29 13:53:10 2011] Assessing source extent using major
[Thu Sep 29 13:53:10 2011] Source does appear to be extended
[Thu Sep 29 13:53:10 2011] Computing asymmetry using major and minor axis, asym = 1.02
[Thu Sep 29 13:53:33 2011] Using EEF radius (= 0.45 ")to estimate initial spatial extent for simple fitting
[Thu Sep 29 13:53:33 2011] Initial guess for spatial extent in simple fitting = 0.45"
[Thu Sep 29 13:53:33 2011] source mask rpix=0.9, npix_max = 8, mask sum = 9, frac = 1.124
[Thu Sep 29 13:53:33 2011] Giving source the simple spatial ID 4 for pass 1, mean size = 0.45"
[Thu Sep 29 13:53:34 2011] fullrun_ccd0_acisf10098_pi14-548_cl_pass1_src4.ximg exists
[Thu Sep 29 13:53:34 2011] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_ccd0_acisf10098_pi14-548_cl_pass1_src4.csv
[Thu Sep 29 13:53:34 2011] fullrun_ccd0_acisf10098_pi14-548_cl_pass1_src4_1.ximg exists
[Thu Sep 29 13:53:34 2011] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_ccd0_acisf10098_pi14-548_cl_pass1_src4.csv
[Thu Sep 29 13:53:34 2011] It looks like the fit did not converge
You should probably delete fullrun_ccd0_acisf10098_pi14-548_cl_pass1_src4_1.ximg
Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_ccd0_acisf10098_pi14-548_cl_pass1_src4.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes
[Thu Sep 29 13:53:34 2011] fullrun_ccd0_acisf10098_pi14-548_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src4.ximg exists
[Thu Sep 29 13:53:34 2011] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_ccd0_acisf10098_pi14-548_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src4.csv
[Thu Sep 29 13:53:34 2011] fullrun_ccd0_acisf10098_pi14-548_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src4_1.ximg exists
[Thu Sep 29 13:53:34 2011] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_ccd0_acisf10098_pi14-548_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src4.csv
[Thu Sep 29 13:53:34 2011] It looks like the fit did not converge
You should probably delete fullrun_ccd0_acisf10098_pi14-548_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src4_1.ximg
Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_ccd0_acisf10098_pi14-548_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src4.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes
[Thu Sep 29 13:53:43 2011] Spatial fit model total counts = 15.516500, observed total counts = 21.000000
[Thu Sep 29 13:53:43 2011] Poor agreement between spatial fit and data for source 7
It may help to tweak spatial fit manually
Not incorporating fit results
[Thu Sep 29 13:53:43 2011] Vigneting correction estimate = 1.000000
[Thu Sep 29 13:53:43 2011] Source flux estimate in the 0.3-8.0 bandpass, Gamma=1.800000 = 0 
[Thu Sep 29 13:53:43 2011] Assessing source extent using major
[Thu Sep 29 13:53:43 2011] Source does appear to be extended
[Thu Sep 29 13:53:43 2011] Computing asymmetry using major and minor axis, asym = 1.02
[Thu Sep 29 13:53:43 2011] Deleting source due to low Poisson probability 0.9