[Mon Sep 26 07:53:05 2011] Detection parameters: Position = (458.7, 787.6) = 0 24 51.49 64 10 9.8 Extent = 0.5" x 0.5", rotation angle = 35 degrees Source counts = 1204.6 +/- 56.3 Background counts = 1959.4 Rate = 0.01 +/- 0.0005 [Mon Sep 26 07:55:41 2011] Off-axis axis estimate = 3.71' [Mon Sep 26 08:14:06 2011] Using EEF radius (= 0.75 ")to estimate initial spatial extent for simple fitting [Mon Sep 26 08:14:06 2011] Initial guess for spatial extent in simple fitting = 0.75" [Mon Sep 26 08:14:06 2011] source mask rpix=1.5, npix_max = 16, mask sum = 16, frac = 0.981 [Mon Sep 26 08:14:06 2011] Giving source the simple spatial ID 63 for pass 0, mean size = 0.75" [Mon Sep 26 08:14:18 2011] fullrun_ccd3_acisf10093_pi14-548_cl_pass0_src63.ximg exists [Mon Sep 26 08:14:19 2011] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_ccd3_acisf10093_pi14-548_cl_pass0_src63.csv [Mon Sep 26 08:14:19 2011] fullrun_ccd3_acisf10093_pi14-548_cl_pass0_src63_1.ximg exists [Mon Sep 26 08:14:19 2011] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_ccd3_acisf10093_pi14-548_cl_pass0_src63.csv [Mon Sep 26 08:14:19 2011] It looks like the fit did not converge You should probably delete fullrun_ccd3_acisf10093_pi14-548_cl_pass0_src63_1.ximg Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_ccd3_acisf10093_pi14-548_cl_pass0_src63.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes [Mon Sep 26 08:14:31 2011] fullrun_ccd3_acisf10093_pi14-548_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src63.ximg exists [Mon Sep 26 08:14:31 2011] fullrun_ccd3_acisf10093_pi14-548_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src63_1.ximg exists [Mon Sep 26 08:14:31 2011] Fit fullrun_ccd3_acisf10093_pi14-548_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src63 appears to have run properly [Mon Sep 26 08:16:22 2011] Warning, spatial fit 63 centroid is now closest to src. 98 [Mon Sep 26 08:16:22 2011] Vigneting correction estimate = 1.000000 [Mon Sep 26 08:16:22 2011] Source flux estimate in the 0.3-8.0 bandpass, Gamma=1.800000 = 0 [Mon Sep 26 08:16:22 2011] Assessing source extent using major [Mon Sep 26 08:16:22 2011] Source does appear to be extended [Mon Sep 26 08:16:22 2011] Computing asymmetry using major and minor axis, asym = 1.04 [Mon Sep 26 08:16:23 2011] Source is confused with source 98 [Mon Sep 26 08:18:37 2011] Using EEF radius (= 0.75 ")to estimate initial spatial extent for simple fitting [Mon Sep 26 08:18:37 2011] Initial guess for spatial extent in simple fitting = 0.75" [Mon Sep 26 08:18:37 2011] source mask rpix=1.5, npix_max = 16, mask sum = 16, frac = 0.981 [Mon Sep 26 08:18:37 2011] Giving source the simple spatial ID 63 for pass 1, mean size = 0.75" [Mon Sep 26 08:18:40 2011] fullrun_ccd3_acisf10093_pi14-548_cl_pass1_src63.ximg exists [Mon Sep 26 08:18:40 2011] fullrun_ccd3_acisf10093_pi14-548_cl_pass1_src63_1.ximg exists [Mon Sep 26 08:18:40 2011] Fit fullrun_ccd3_acisf10093_pi14-548_cl_pass1_src63 appears to have run properly [Mon Sep 26 08:18:43 2011] fullrun_ccd3_acisf10093_pi14-548_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src63.ximg exists [Mon Sep 26 08:18:43 2011] fullrun_ccd3_acisf10093_pi14-548_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src63_1.ximg exists [Mon Sep 26 08:18:43 2011] Fit fullrun_ccd3_acisf10093_pi14-548_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src63 appears to have run properly [Mon Sep 26 08:20:13 2011] Source 94 is offset by 5.181529 and 4.366217 pixels which is larger than 2 X fitted extent = 0.791797 x 0.791797, not incorporating fit results [Mon Sep 26 08:20:13 2011] Spatial fit model total counts = 11556.900000, observed total counts = 11541.000000 [Mon Sep 26 08:20:13 2011] Offset between fit and detection position for source 94 = 1.796006 pixels [Mon Sep 26 08:20:13 2011] Warning, changing simple spatial fit ID from 63 to 74 [Mon Sep 26 08:20:13 2011] 11427.385000 total counts/ 11407.200000 bgd. counts: snr = 0.188990 Spatial fit parameters: Offset between fit and detection position for source 94 = 1.796006 pixels Position = (460.5, 787.7) = 0 24 51.39 64 10 9.6 Extent = 0.6 (0.4-2.0)", rotation angle = 0 Source counts = 20.2 +/- 106.9 Background counts = 11407.2 Rate = 0.0002 +/- 0.0009 Deleting source due to low Poisson probability