[Mon Sep 26 07:47:35 2011] Detection parameters:
  Position = (997.9, 832.1) = 0 25 56.53 64 7 17.8
  Extent = 0.6" x 0.5", rotation angle = 122 degrees
  Source counts = 85.2 +/- 14.1
  Background counts = 112.8
  Rate = 0.0007 +/- 0.0001

[Mon Sep 26 07:48:28 2011] Off-axis axis estimate = 3.96'
[Mon Sep 26 08:13:31 2011] Using EEF radius (= 0.82 ")to estimate initial spatial extent for simple fitting
[Mon Sep 26 08:13:31 2011] Initial guess for spatial extent in simple fitting = 0.82"
[Mon Sep 26 08:13:31 2011] source mask rpix=1.7, npix_max = 18, mask sum = 10, frac = 0.535
[Mon Sep 26 08:13:31 2011] Giving source the simple spatial ID 53 for pass 0, mean size = 0.82"
[Mon Sep 26 08:13:33 2011] fullrun_ccd0_acisf10093_pi14-548_cl_pass0_src53.ximg exists
[Mon Sep 26 08:13:33 2011] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_ccd0_acisf10093_pi14-548_cl_pass0_src53.csv
[Mon Sep 26 08:13:33 2011] fullrun_ccd0_acisf10093_pi14-548_cl_pass0_src53_1.ximg exists
[Mon Sep 26 08:13:33 2011] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_ccd0_acisf10093_pi14-548_cl_pass0_src53.csv
[Mon Sep 26 08:13:33 2011] It looks like the fit did not converge
You should probably delete fullrun_ccd0_acisf10093_pi14-548_cl_pass0_src53_1.ximg
Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_ccd0_acisf10093_pi14-548_cl_pass0_src53.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes
[Mon Sep 26 08:13:38 2011] fullrun_ccd0_acisf10093_pi14-548_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src53.ximg exists
[Mon Sep 26 08:13:38 2011] fullrun_ccd0_acisf10093_pi14-548_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src53_1.ximg exists
[Mon Sep 26 08:13:38 2011] Fit fullrun_ccd0_acisf10093_pi14-548_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src53 appears to have run properly
[Mon Sep 26 08:15:30 2011] Warning, spatial fit 53 centroid is now closest to src. 154
[Mon Sep 26 08:15:30 2011] Vigneting correction estimate = 1.000000
[Mon Sep 26 08:15:30 2011] Source flux estimate in the 0.3-8.0 bandpass, Gamma=1.800000 = 0 
[Mon Sep 26 08:15:30 2011] Assessing source extent using major
[Mon Sep 26 08:15:30 2011] Source does appear to be extended
[Mon Sep 26 08:15:30 2011] Computing asymmetry using major and minor axis, asym = 1.12
[Mon Sep 26 08:15:31 2011] Source is confused with source 56
[Mon Sep 26 08:17:56 2011] Using EEF radius (= 0.82 ")to estimate initial spatial extent for simple fitting
[Mon Sep 26 08:17:56 2011] Initial guess for spatial extent in simple fitting = 0.82"
[Mon Sep 26 08:17:56 2011] source mask rpix=1.7, npix_max = 18, mask sum = 10, frac = 0.535
[Mon Sep 26 08:17:56 2011] Giving source the simple spatial ID 52 for pass 1, mean size = 0.82"
[Mon Sep 26 08:18:01 2011] fullrun_ccd0_acisf10093_pi14-548_cl_pass1_src52.ximg exists
[Mon Sep 26 08:18:01 2011] fullrun_ccd0_acisf10093_pi14-548_cl_pass1_src52_1.ximg exists
[Mon Sep 26 08:18:01 2011] Fit fullrun_ccd0_acisf10093_pi14-548_cl_pass1_src52 appears to have run properly
[Mon Sep 26 08:18:09 2011] fullrun_ccd0_acisf10093_pi14-548_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src52.ximg exists
[Mon Sep 26 08:18:09 2011] fullrun_ccd0_acisf10093_pi14-548_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src52_1.ximg exists
[Mon Sep 26 08:18:09 2011] Fit fullrun_ccd0_acisf10093_pi14-548_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src52 appears to have run properly
[Mon Sep 26 08:19:24 2011] Warning: source 4 in spatial fitting list does not appear to have a counterpart in memory, closest src. was src. 58 at 15.050591 pixels away
[Mon Sep 26 08:19:24 2011] Warning: source 7 in spatial fitting list does not appear to have a counterpart in memory, closest src. was src. 58 at 59.928396 pixels away
[Mon Sep 26 08:19:24 2011] Warning: source 21 in spatial fitting list does not appear to have a counterpart in memory, closest src. was src. 58 at 62.568321 pixels away
[Mon Sep 26 08:19:24 2011] Warning: source 26 in spatial fitting list does not appear to have a counterpart in memory, closest src. was src. 58 at 10.707589 pixels away
[Mon Sep 26 08:19:24 2011] Warning: source 41 in spatial fitting list does not appear to have a counterpart in memory, closest src. was src. 58 at 12.753455 pixels away
[Mon Sep 26 08:19:24 2011] Warning: source 47 in spatial fitting list does not appear to have a counterpart in memory, closest src. was src. 58 at 59.315292 pixels away
[Mon Sep 26 08:19:24 2011] Source 58 is offset by -3.695794 and 7.905602 pixels which is larger than
2 X fitted extent = 4.640569 x 4.640569, not incorporating fit results
[Mon Sep 26 08:19:24 2011] Warning: source 50 in spatial fitting list does not appear to have a counterpart in memory, closest src. was src. 58 at 20.653844 pixels away
[Mon Sep 26 08:19:24 2011] Warning: source 51 in spatial fitting list does not appear to have a counterpart in memory, closest src. was src. 58 at 13.707726 pixels away
[Mon Sep 26 08:19:24 2011] Source 58 is offset by 5.861137 and -7.550028 pixels which is larger than
2 X fitted extent = 1.988065 x 1.988065, not incorporating fit results
[Mon Sep 26 08:19:24 2011] Vigneting correction estimate = 1.000000
[Mon Sep 26 08:19:24 2011] Source flux estimate in the 0.3-8.0 bandpass, Gamma=1.800000 = 0 
[Mon Sep 26 08:19:24 2011] Assessing source extent using major
[Mon Sep 26 08:19:24 2011] Source does appear to be extended
[Mon Sep 26 08:19:24 2011] Computing asymmetry using major and minor axis, asym = 1.12
[Mon Sep 26 08:19:25 2011] Deleting source due to low Poisson probability 1.0