Next: Future work
Up: Captures...
Previous: Numerical
models
Our simulations cover 20Gyrs. Over this time scale, the nucleus
model experiences a relatively important evolution. Most notably,
significant relaxational mass segregation occurs, as Fig. 1
testifies.
Fig. 2 shows the evolution of the capture rates as well as the
orbital
parameters at captures.
Figure 1:
Mass-segregation due to 2-body
Relaxation in our simulation of the Galactic centre. (a):
evolution of the Lagrangian radii, i.e. the radii of spheres
containing the indicated fraction of the total mass of the various
stellar species: MS stars, white dwarfs (WD), neutron stars (NS)
and stellar BHs (BH). (b): Density profiles at the end of the
simulation (
Gyrs).
![\begin{figure}\psfig{figure=mass_segr.eps,width=16cm}\end{figure}](img27.png) |
Figure 2:
Captures through emission of gravitational waves
for our simulation of the Galactic centre. (a): Evolution of
the
capture rates for the various stellar species is shown. Note that only
a small number of events have occurred for stellar BHs or NSs, hence
the noisy curves. (b): Orbital parameters
at capture for each event (which has a statistical weight of 65.5
stars).
is the eccentricity and
the pericentre
distance (in units of the Schwarzschild radius). The surface of points
for MSSs is proportional to the mass of the captured star. Capture
of compact remnants are represented with diamond symbols.
![\begin{figure}\psfig{figure=captures.eps,width=16cm}\end{figure}](img29.png) |
These orbital parameters are used to integrate the orbits of
captured stars down to horizon crossing (Glampedakis
et al., 2002) and compute the
gravitational waves emitted (Pierro
et al., 2001), as illustrated by Fig. 3.
Applying this computation to all capture events during some time
interval, one determines the expected number of captured stars around
Sgr A
that are emitting above any given LISA
signal-to-noise
ratio. Fig. 4 is the result of this procedure.
Figure 3: (a):
Gravitational signal for two
events from our Sgr A
simulation, a WD and a
low-mass MSS. We plot the
amplitude vs frequency for the 5 first Fourier components of the
quadrupolar radiation(Pierro et al.,
2001). The crosses represent the
position
years before plunge through the horizon.
Other ticks
show positions
,
,
,
,
,
year, 1 month
and 1 day before plunge. The dotted segments for the MSS correspond to
a pericentre distance below tidal disruption radius. The solid black
line is LISA's intrinsic
noise(
, Larson
et al., 2000). The dashed line is an
estimate of the confusion noise due to unresolved WD binaries in our
Galaxy(Bender & Hils, 1997). (b):
Waveforms (
and
polarisations) at successive times during the orbital evolution of the
MS star.
![\begin{figure}\psfig{figure=signals.eps,width=16cm}\end{figure}](img31.png) |
The most striking
results concern MS stars. The predicted number of sources with
SNR above 10 is of order 3-5 if one neglects tidal interactions
until
the stars enters the Roche zone (
)
and is considered destroyed. If one
assumes pessimistically that all the energy of the tides (computed for
a nearly parabolic orbit (McMillan
et al., 1987)) is used to swell the star
which is removed from the computation when the accumulated tidal
energy amounts to 20% of its self-binding energy, one still gets of
order 0.5-2 MSS sources with
.
Figure 4:
Expected number of sources of gravitational waves at the Galactic
centre. We show
the number of objects predicted to produce a signal above a given
signal-to-noise ratio (
). The orbital evolution of each
captured star, as driven by emission of gravitational radiation around
a non-spinning black hole, has been integrated down to plunge
instability or tidal disruption(Glampedakis
et al., 2002) and, at each time, we
select the Fourier component of the quadrupolar
radiation(Pierro et al., 2001)
yielding the highest SNR. The upper curve for
MS stars is obtained when tidal heating is neglected. The lower curve
corresponds to a pessimistic estimate of the decrease in the number of
sources due to tidal heating.
![\begin{figure}\psfig{figure=rates.eps,width=12cm}\end{figure}](img35.png) |
Only very low mass MSSs contribute; more massive but less dense ones
suffer from early tidal disruption. Hence, captured MSSs could only be
detected at the Galactic centre, many
years before
plunge. All
other sources are predicted to be compact remnants in galaxies at
distances of a few hundreds of Mpc, during the last few months or
years of inspiral.
Next: Future work
Up: Captures...
Previous: Numerical
models
Marc Freitag
2003-10-03